View Full Version : Rations
pvt. tommy
12-11-2003, 05:46 PM
Gentlemen,
I have acquired the recipe for the dreaded "axle grease' and am attempting to make some for a l/h in Florence, SC this weekend. I am wondering what to put it in before putting in the haversack. I considered doing a thorough wash job on a cap tin and using it. Anything I can put my hands on that is period correct would probably have a cork in it and way too small of an opening.
Your suggestions are most appreciated!
I am,
Tommy Rollings
8th. SCVI
Palmetto Battalion
Spinster
12-11-2003, 06:44 PM
Both Village Tinsmith and Jarnigan have carried a correct container at various times---you need the item this weekend though, so your best bet really is a well washed cap tin, then acquire something more appropriate at a later date.
On one occassion, I managed to make it solid enough to risk rolling it up in balls and using a twist of brown paper to contain it. Nothing like coffee all over everything in your haversack to keep you alert though.
Bent Rabbit
12-11-2003, 06:53 PM
Depending on the consistency of the goo when you're finished, I found that using a tin inserted in a poke sack, and then bundle up the sack nice and tight before going into the haversack will save you from having sticky knuckles later... :D
Dave Gager
www.cwchaps.com
Mr. Gager: AC FORUM rules prohibit the use of cartoons, etc. for avatars. Please change yours to a period style image of yourself, or a modern image of yourself. Consider this your 1st Warning. Curt-Heinrich Schmidt, Moderator
tarwater_mess
12-11-2003, 07:32 PM
I do not have facts on hand hoping others may. However, I have read references to this before. This dreaded "Axle Grease" was packed in quantities far greater than a personal tin. The Essence of Coffee was usually packed in 5# cans, sometimes as large as 25# cans. This was usually prepared at company level quantities usuing 5#'s at a time.
I guess it could have been possible for you to get a small can, for personal consumption, from your local regimental sutler.
Personally, I would grab some green coffee beans and roast'em up in a mess kettle or pan.
Anyone with good concrete research on this?
markj
12-11-2003, 08:19 PM
Greetings,
Another possibility might be John Peterson at Otter Creek Tinware:
http://www.sover.net/~ottertin/ottertin/octinw1.html
I know "Victor Trading Company" also sells 19th century-style cans but, to my knowledge, these are "decorative only":
http://www.victortradingco.com/
John Peterson and I have discussed reproducing "Arthur's Patent Self-Sealing Can," which was definitely available (at least in the Philadelphia area) from circa 1853 onward. I not only found patent information for this item but also a number of interesting articles and illustrations dealing with it in 1850's numbers of "Arthur's Home Magazine." John is apparently working on a prototype right now so we'll see what happens. This would be just the ticket for you--a resealable, as well as reusable, can.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Jack Booda
12-11-2003, 08:24 PM
Quote from a very good article by Art Ayotte; link shown below.
"Extract of Coffee was a combination of concentrated coffee; milk and sugar, all vacuum distilled down to a thick paste. It came packed in several size containers from five gallon tins down to one quart cans. One gallon was supposed to make one day's ration of coffee for one hundred men."
http://fugawee.com/coffee.htm
I don't know how much a quart of essence weighs (5 lbs.?), but it looks like Mark Mason has a good point. Individuals may not have been issued small containers of essence for personal use.
markj
12-11-2003, 09:22 PM
Hi,
Another perfectly plausible scenario is that essence of coffee was, at times, available through friendly neighborhood sutlers or could be acquired if one was passing through reasonably well-stocked towns. If so, then, depending on one's situation, having a small can in their possession would be perfectly okay.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
bluebellybugleboy
12-24-2003, 10:35 AM
pards:
well me and a pard of mine have been wondering where exactly can me and him buy a period frying pan , we are going to campaign next year and have been wondering , thanks.
LibertyHallVols
12-24-2003, 10:52 AM
Oh, if the data from the old forums was back!! There was an informative thread on this very subject.
In a nut: Frank Ellis does a very fine job. Otherwise, you'll have to buy a stamped frying pan from Sutlerz Row vendor of your choice and find a blacksmith to snip off the handle and add a correct one on for you.
Anyone have Mr. Ellis' contact info handy?
dusty27
12-24-2003, 10:57 AM
Frank Ellis<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = O /><O:P style="MARGIN: 0px"> </O:P>
<O:P style="MARGIN: 0px"></O:P>Rt. 1, Box 341
Greenbriar, TN 37073
615-643-4842
Great pans, great service, good turn around time.
Frank is the only way to go. His work is top notch. :D
bluebellybugleboy
12-24-2003, 01:36 PM
Pards:
what exactly do the period handles look like , is there a web site that shows a period correct handle? thanks .
I also heard some where that canteen halves can be used and where common but I think that might be more of a confederate thing, and not a union.
Rob
dusty27
12-24-2003, 02:15 PM
Rob,
Frank doesn't have a website, but I own two of his pans and they are great. I don't know of anyone who doesn't think so.
You can use a canteen half. I don't think it is a Confederate/Union issue.....
JimKindred
12-24-2003, 02:18 PM
Rob,
Look for websites dealing in antiques, don't search for Civil War but for the time period of 1840-1860 when looking for information. You can also look in your local library for books dealing with antique identification. While the internet is a great tool, printed material is not dead.
straggler
12-24-2003, 02:46 PM
If it is of any assistance, I can attempt to post a picture of Mr. Ellis' work
later today.
DougCooper
12-24-2003, 03:23 PM
anybody who lives on Possum Trot Lane has got to be authentic :D Seriously, Frank is the man on fry pans. One of the those "pry it out of my cold dead hands" pieces of kit. I carry his 11" version everywhere and have been offerred cash for the "antique" several times. Original pans (and Frank's)are much lighter than most repro's. Frank's prices are excellent as well (don't tell him).
Jimmayo
12-24-2003, 04:03 PM
Pards:
what exactly do the period handles look like , is there a web site that shows a period correct handle? thanks .
I also heard some where that canteen halves can be used and where common but I think that might be more of a confederate thing, and not a union.
Rob
Got a pic of a frying pan handle on this page http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/tools/tools.html
IMO Canteen halves are more of a unionism than a confederate. At least I have found more halves in union camps (6) than in confederate camps (0).
straggler
12-24-2003, 07:49 PM
Using the 'manage attachment' feature to attempt adding a photo of
Frank's fry pans.
bluebellybugleboy
12-24-2003, 08:12 PM
Pards;
thanks I wasn't sure quite what the whole thing looked like. but now I have a picture and remembered. i will see about getting one . thanks to you all , and let santa claus bring you something other than hardtack this christmas ...... hmm, maybe coal will be good ..... or maybe a toothbrush.
Rob
John Peterson
12-24-2003, 09:06 PM
This is from the Dover Stamping Company catalog of 1869. It was a Boston based company that wholesaled various sheetmetal wares and tinners tools, etc.
http://www.sover.net/~ottertin/ottertin/frypans.jpg
In addition to "plain", they were also available "tinned" and "polished." The handle pictured here was mass produced and very common from the 1840s into the 20th century. By the 1860s they were replacing the hand-made style handle that Mr. Ellis produces. More recently made pans can be easily "retro-fitted" by drilling out the 3 spot welds and putting in rivets. They are not difficult to find at barn sales, junk shops, etc. and only need the rivets to make them period appropriate.
64OVI
12-25-2003, 12:34 AM
Speaking of cooking equipage..is there a source for spiders?
Kent Dorr
"Kick It up a Notch" Mess
Clark Badgett
12-25-2003, 02:10 AM
I have to agree with Jim here. The only place I've ever seen canteen halves mentioned as fry pans was in Union soldier recollections. Anybody have and Cornfed references?
John Peterson
12-25-2003, 12:57 PM
Speaking of cooking equipage..is there a source for spiders?
You'd have better luck finding spiders with 18th century period sutlers. (for example, here's a sheet iron one:
http://www.gggodwin.com/308.htm) and there is a reason for that.
In some cases "spider" has been used interchangeably with "frying pan" but, as many probably realize, it typically was a legged pan, meant to be used for hearth cooking or sometimes a trivet put over coals and upon which a pan might be set. They survived past the 1860s but their usage was already tapering off by that time as more and more households began to use cook stoves. till, the practice of hearth cooking persisted, primarily in poor rural homes.
Spiders are neat and I would be the first to admit that I have a thing for period cooking wares ... but many of us have seen campfires at events with an abundance of heavy iron cooking accessories. Some of those ironwares might even be authentic to the period, however, they are out-of-place in that setting. If you must use a fry pan, a plain old sheet iron (as opposed to cast iron) frying pan would make a lot more sense. From a practical point of view it's lighter and you don't have to worry about getting poked with those legs; and for another thing, it would be more commonly available during the 1860s than a spider.
On the other hand, some of us just can't resist cool toys ... I've got lots of period cooking utensils that will never make it to an event. I recommend thinking the scenario through before bringing a spider to an authentic event. (For example - it might work as a pilfered item in a winter-quarters setting.)
My 2 cents
bluebellybugleboy
12-29-2003, 09:22 PM
pards:
how authentic is cooking food in your tin cup? I've done it before in boy scouts , ands made many a cup of coffee in my old cup, but how period is it ?
John E. Tobey
01-01-2004, 12:36 PM
FWIW, here's a photo of a frying pan that was carried by a Federal soldier. Once part of a GAR exhibit in Trumansburg, NY, the tag says: "Frying Pan Knife Fork & Spoon that went from Atlanta to the Sea." It was the property of Henry Rudie of the 137th NY. It is 7-1/2 inches in diameter, and weighs only 13 ounces.
John Tobey
markj
01-05-2004, 01:47 PM
Greetings,
As always, you be the judge:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2215641061&category=13960
Regards,
Mark D. Jaeger
ScottCross
01-05-2004, 02:46 PM
While working at the Wisconsin Veteran's Museum, I worked on the Civil War items transferred there from the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Included in the transfer were dozens of original Civil War hardcrackers. This one on ebay is very similar if not identical to those I cataloged: shape; size; condition; etc. Even the old ink identification on it is similar to identifications I have seen on some. More than likely, it is a Federal piece of hardtack and not Confederate.
Johan Steele
01-06-2004, 12:10 AM
I am trying to find the correct dimensions for a hard tack box as would have been used to issue 50 lbs of hard tack. I have checked numerous references and have had no luck. I am rather certain their was a thread on it on the old forum but again have had no luck in my search.
Can anyone point me in the correct direction? I'm planning to build three or four for my wifes cook impression to store kitchen items and I would also like to make a pair to have laying about camp as a convenient camp stools for my Company.
THank in advance for any assistance.
hardtack1864
01-06-2004, 02:15 AM
Go to dixie leather works. They have what you need, but don't put the rope on the box and the higes either.
Clark Badgett
01-06-2004, 05:17 AM
From Kautz's Custom's of Service
Length- 26", height (ends)- 11" width- 18"
Also from an article James R. Loba & Leslie D. Jenson in the Journal of The Company Of Military Historians Vol. XLVIII No. 3, fall 1996 contains diminsions of 3 original boxes: all measurements are length, height(ends), width and in inches.
Robert Sterns, Brooklyn NY, Sept/62- 25 3/4, 10 3/4, 18.
Kendall Bros & Co. June/63- 25 3/4, 10 3/4, 18 1/4.
A.T. Hanks, Brroklyn NY, May/64- 25, 11 3/8, 17 7/8.
Ends seemed to be of thicker wood that the sides and tops/bottoms. Also the originals examined for this article had the top/bottom pieces tounge and grooved from 2 similarily sized pieces. Two of the boxes retained vestiges of their sapling banding. I would suggest you obtain this issue for your files, as it is very informative. Lots of nice pictures too.
http://company.military-historians.org/journal/journal.htm
markj
01-06-2004, 09:43 AM
Hi,
I don't have the U.S. Army Regulations of 1861 (rev. 1863) in front of me but I do believe hardtack box dimensions are also listed therein. I have also found dimensions for boxes listed in published contractor bid solicitations issued by the Cincinnati QM Depot in 1862. These vary somewhat from the "official specs." If you want these, let me know and I'll dig them out of my vast pile of clippings.
Of course, if you have the greenbacks, you can save yourself the trouble and simply buy the boxes direct from the G. H. Bent Company or Greenewood Boxes:
https://www.bentscookiefactory.com/Gifts.htm#crate
http://greenewood.freeyellow.com/Hardtack.html
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Robert Braun
01-06-2004, 10:54 AM
While working at the Wisconsin Veteran's Museum, I worked on the Civil War items transferred there from the State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Included in the transfer were dozens of original Civil War hardcrackers. This one on ebay is very similar if not identical to those I cataloged: shape; size; condition; etc. Even the old ink identification on it is similar to identifications I have seen on some. More than likely, it is a Federal piece of hardtack and not Confederate.
I have been fortunate to personally examine several of the artifacts mentioned by Mr. Cross, and concur with his statements.
Bob.
sivart
01-06-2004, 09:24 PM
I can understand why you would want them for your wife’s cooking impression, but I cannot understand why you would want them for your camp?
A wooden box in the 1860’s was to them what cardboard boxes are to us. They wouldn’t last long, especially in a stationary camp. Wooden boxes broken up make great firewood.
If your men need something to sit on, the ground always works best. :D
I do not mean to be mean with this post in any way, just something to ponder.
Johan Steele
01-06-2004, 11:37 PM
Actually, it's exactly because they were like cardboard that I want to make a couple to put in the camp for use as... whatever. Whether as a temprorary table or seat it doesn't matter. I essentially got to thinking the other day when I had last seen a hardtack box in a re-enactment. I could only recall one among some boys of the 2nd Wisconsin at one of my first events. As my unit primarily does Living History & we shi away from the powder burning battles I thought a couple of hardtack box laying about camp would be a good idea.
I actually ran across an original a couple monthes ago that had been hinged and at some point had been used as a tool box. I was suprised at how well built it was and how well it had held up across a century and a half. If I had been thinking I would have taken the dimensions of the thing so I could properly replicate it. They wanted $250 for it... I almost choked when I realized what it was. Some enteprising Cav smithy had taken the time to line it w/ cedar shingles and made compartments for some of his tools. He had tacked leather hinges onto the thing and tacked a pair of horse shoes onto it as handles. It was a pretty impressive tool box, if I had the ready money to grab it up I would have. In the same collection there was an original Sharp's carbine ammo box worked in a similar way... that went for $400.
BorderReb
01-13-2004, 03:45 PM
Here is contact information for Dixie Leather Works.
Dixie Leather Works
PO Box 8221
Paducah, KY 42002-8221
orders 1-800-888-5183
fax 1-270-442-1049
phone 1-270-442-1058
dlw@apex.net
ohio volunteer
01-15-2004, 09:55 PM
Mark,
Can you send me the specs by the Cincinnati QM Depot?
My email is general1862@aol.com
thanks,
markj
01-16-2004, 10:25 AM
Hi,
The dimensions for hardtack boxes, bacon boxes, salt meat barrels, etc. are stated in U.S. Army Regulations of 1861 (rev. 1863) on pages 301-302 in the subsistence section under the heading "MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS." An "average box" for hard bread was to be 26 x 17 x 11 inches, exterior in measure. "The ends of a box of this size should be of inch, and the remainder of five-eighths, stuff, the package well strapped with green hickory or other suitable wood." The Cincinnati specs vary somewhat from those stated above. Also note the Regulation dimensions vary a little from what is stated in Kautz.
In the 1863 CS Regulations (NHS reprint), sample box dimensions are listed on page 196, again in the subsistence section. However, no specific information is provided for hard bread boxes. I'm not sure why this isn't stated but it may reflect logistical realities--hard tack was likely less common in the C.S. Army as the war progressed due to wheat flour shortages. Also, on page 132, there is a table showing weight and bulk of rations so, I suppose, one could potentially extrapolate the necessary dimensions and weights of boxes using it as well as information provided elsewhere (I suspect they're identical to those in U.S. Regulations).
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Moonshine
01-16-2004, 12:31 PM
I'm tired of burning beeswax candles! Anyone have a source for tallow ones...?
Much appreciated in advance for any help!
Jim Ross
va-yank
01-16-2004, 04:03 PM
Hmmm, will watch this with interest. No, I do not know where to get tallow candles, and might also be interested.
The item I settled on some time ago is apparently made of beeswax and parrafin, and of a sort of yellow-brown tint. They are slightly greasy and fairly long burning. They are dipped, and come two to a string. Regimental QM (shudder) sells them in Gettysburg.
Parafin is a by-product of petroleum refining, which was in its infancy during the CW. Which raises the questions, were they still using pure tallow or some hybrid by the time of the CW? This question pertains to what type of candles were being issued by the U.S. per my impression.
Have you used tallow candles before? Sure you want to?
Good luck!
Hank Trent
01-16-2004, 05:07 PM
Star candles (adamantine candles) were one popular period choice, and an improvement on tallow. They're available at church supply houses among other places, including some online ones. They look and burn a lot like paraffin.
Star candles were included among the options in ration issues, though it would depend on the time and place as to what actually got issued. For example, from the ORs: "sperm candles to 100 rations, 1 pound, or star candles to 100 rations, 1 1/4 pounds; or tallow candles, to 100 rations 1 1/2 pounds."
Paraffin candles were advertised for sale in the Gallipolis, Ohio newspaper here, so they were around for civilian use, but don't know if they were ever issued to the army.
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
markj
01-16-2004, 05:30 PM
Hi,
"Stearin" was reportedly first isolated from tallow in 1823 and was subsequently used in candles to make them smoke less and give off more light.
stearin
SYLLABICATION: ste·a·rin
PRONUNCIATION: str-n, stîrn
VARIANT FORMS: also ste·a·rine ( str-n, --rn, stîrn)
NOUN: 1. A colorless, odorless, tasteless ester of glycerol and stearic acid, C3H5(C18H35O2)3, found in most animal and vegetable fats and used in the manufacture of soaps, candles, and adhesives and for textile sizing. Also called tristearin. 2. The solid form of fat.
ETYMOLOGY: French stéarine : Greek stear, tallow; see sti- in Appendix I + French -ine
I would suppose that "star candles" are a corruption of "STEARINE candles."
This might be of interest to you:
http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usamhi/Bibliographies/ReferenceBibliographies/equipment/genmisc.doc
This addresses the subject from a Confederate perspective:
http://www.uttyl.edu/vbetts/lighting.htm
Some possible places to find tallow candles are:
Coyote Found Candles and the Moravian Book Shop (both have websites). If they don't have them, maybe they know somebody who does.
Also, here is a website describing how to make tallow candles:
http://www.smith.edu/hsc/museum/ancient_inventions/candles3.html
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Vuhginyuh
01-16-2004, 06:29 PM
Mark Jeager's reference is spot on.
''NATCHEZ DAILY COURIER, March 19, 1861, p. 3, c. 4
Star candles--100 boxes Proctor & Gamble's full weight Star Candles, received and for sale by Ray & Grant, Natchez Landing.
Soap--200 boxes Procter & Gamble's Soap, received and for sale by Ray & Grant, Natchez Landing.''
BEAUTIFUL PRIMARY SOURCE!
Hard beef or ''yellow fat''* when rendered is tallow, soft fat is grease. Tallow was used in candles and grease was used for soap.
Procter & Gamble started life as chandlers and it was common practice for them to collect fat from tanners and hide companies and buy un-needed fat from households.
Horse fat could be rendered as well.
Pork fat was saved for the kitchen and the table.
Make your own soap and candles it is very easy...
* My great-grandmother, Julia Branch Parker, a war baby.
GWilson
01-19-2004, 10:41 PM
How often were whiskey rations issued? How much would an individual recieve and how strong would it be? Also, where flasks commonly used or are they are modern type item. Thanks
1stMaine
01-19-2004, 11:25 PM
Comrade,
The one episode that I know of was to Hood's Texas brigade after crossing the Potomac on the way to gettysburg. J.B.Polley, who was a member of the 4th Texas, recounted in his history of the Brigade that some officers had located a barrel of Whiskey, and set it by the road, and knocked the top off. As the brigade filed by, each man was allowed to dip his cup into it and draw some out. those who didn't drink were encouraged to draw some for those who did. Being that it had been some time since the last occasion they had access to strong spirits, and because of the warmth of the day, the alcohol seemed to have a rather quick effect upon the men. Those who were too enebriated to continue were taken to the nearest source of water and had their heads soaked until they were "right". The officers apparently had more than a little difficulty in keeping the column closed up. According to Polley, it was one of their longest marches...not so much on account of the LENGTH of the road, but because of it's WIDTH:)
respects,
Johan Steele
01-19-2004, 11:43 PM
The man I portray lost his stripes because he stole a "...hogshead of good Whiskey from the Colonels tent and distributed it to the enlisted men of the Regiment." Apparently he felt it an injustice that the officers had as much spirits as they could desire while enlisted men had none. I think the whiskey ration depended from unit to unit as I've read of Regiments never receiving a ration and others receiving a ration on a regular occasion.
hireddutchcutthroat
01-19-2004, 11:59 PM
Well not exactly a wiskey ration, but it is booze related.
On Christmas Eve 1861 a large group of Norwegens and Swedes from the 15th Wisconsin, stole a keg of beer from, and proceded to brawl with members of the Irish 17th Wisconsin. Acording to several period acounts the Scandinavians out drank and out fought the Irishmen.
MuddyTrowsers
01-20-2004, 01:18 AM
This also is not whisky, but it involves alchohol nonetheless.
From the Civil War Diary of Arthur C. Mellette (Co. H, 9th Indian Infantry) Mellette was rather meticulous and often recorded exactly what he ate and drank most days:
Frid. Apr'l 21st 1865
"...Bought some cheese & beer..."
Thurs. June 1st 1865
"Weaker & worse––got money & drank some beer. Seems to do me the most good of anything."
Source:
Arthur Calvin Mellette, The Civil War Diary of Arthur Calvin Mellette, ed. Gerald W. Wolff and Joanita Kant (Watertown, SD: Interstate Publishing Co., 1983), 63,69.
KentuckyReb
01-20-2004, 05:02 AM
You're wanting to portray accurate whiskey consumption, most likely in a cup. Maybe a canteen, if it was 'liberated' from somewhere. Most likely out of camp, or if it's in camp then away from the NCOs or officers. Not so much out of respect for regulation as for the risk of having it 'RE-liberated'. Flasks were probably generally the province of officers, and walkin' around camp with a bottle in one's face was a real good way to lose said bottle, as well as one's liberty. So probably no flask except for an officer or an early-war rank/file.
C.Osgood
01-20-2004, 09:08 AM
How often were whiskey rations issued? How much would an individual recieve and how strong would it be? Also, where flasks commonly used or are they are modern type item. Thanks
Captain. Wesley Brainard Co.C 50th NY Engineers, carried a barrel of whiskey in his personal bagage wagon, to issue out to the members of his company. I dont have the book in front of me, but I believe he said that anytime they had to build a bridge or do any other hard physical work he issued them some whiskey. However, it makes no mention of how much was issued.
On a side note, every company in the regiment had a nickname. Co.C was known as Theiving C and Co.D as Whiskey D, must be they had a fine taste for whiskey.
While Serving as OOD (officer of the day) Capt. Brainard noticed some members of the regiment, while stationed in washington carrying their weapons very carefully at support arms. When stoped by the Sgt. of the guard, they noticed the barrels and nipples on the muskets were pluged very carefully and were full of whiskey. That explained the mass amount of camp drunkedness that had been going on.
Anyhow I hope this info is of some use,
markj
01-20-2004, 11:00 AM
Hi,
Depending on time, place, and availability troops did receive whiskey rations. One gill--about 4 oz. (1/4 pint) was the usual amount "issued" to fatigue parties (ostensibly for "morale" and "medicinal" purposes). Even this seemingly small amount, according to a number of diary entries I've seen, was enough to put some men "three sheets to the wind."
Ethnic German units, such as the 32nd Indiana, were known to receive beer rations whenever possible. Such "rations" usually consisted of three glasses (or their tin cup equivalent) per day and were considered to be part of the "bread ration." Needless to say, the 32nd IVI was pretty healthy: of the 268 deaths in its ranks, only 97 were from disease--a roughly 3-1 ratio and the almost exact opposite of its "American" counterparts.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
10TnVI
01-20-2004, 11:43 AM
Since the book I'm currently reading mentions the subject- "Soldiering With Sherman" THe C.W. Letters of George F. Cram (105th Illinois)
lpart of a letter written from June16-June 19, 1864 from near Marrietta
"Sunday, June 19 The rain.....In the afternoon we drew two days more rations and rations of whiskey were issued to the men, singular enough, that when the troops are living on reduced rations, transportation should be used to draw the meanest of whiskey to steal away their brains aand injure their systems, but I am happy to add that a large number of Company F refused theirs."
Ina letter dated August 4, 1864 written "in the field 2 miles north of Atlanta
..."You wish to know about the Sanitary and Christian Commissions. When I was at Resasc with Tirtlot I had charge of all sanitary and commissary stores there and we constantly had for the wounded soda crackers, condensed milk, pickled potatoes & cabbage, extract of beef, dried fruit and some other little things furnished by the S.C. while govt. commissary could furnish them nothing but hard crackers, pork, beef(bad) coffee, sugar and beans. Also each badly wounded man was furnished with a clean white shirt. Drawers and socks by the S.C. Also all the lint and bandages and much of the chloroform were furnished by the S.C. Besides these we recieved many dozen bottles of whiskey, brandy and different cordials, from the S.C."
And just for counterpoint-
" The Christian Commision is also a good thing and we frequently get religious papers through them. They do much good in different ways."
Jim of The SRR
01-24-2004, 12:51 AM
From "Eye of the Storm" by Pvt Robert Knox Sneden of the 49th NY:
"Nov 16, 1861 at Leesburg Turnpike, VA
The Whiskey ration was the great desiration. Three gallons of whiskey was drawn from the brigade commissary for 100 men. One gallon of this was mized with three buckets of water and a gill given to each hard working soldier morning and evening. The remaining two gallons was kept in the officers; tents for their own use and card playing and drinking went on until midnight sometimes. The officers did not work at all, as they knew little of nothing of how it should be done. They looked on and gave a few directions. Still being an officer settled their right to the lion's share of the whiskey, or 'commissary' as it was called so they thought. Many of them had swelled heads in the morning and probably had to go out on picket duty at that."
Regards,
Jim Butler
The SRR
DougCooper
01-24-2004, 09:40 AM
Been a long time since I shopped for a bread box - I do remember Rocky of the Southern Guard made them extremely well in the 90's. Is he still making them? Anybody else?
How about Bent vs Mechanical - best biscuits?
thanks
markmason
01-24-2004, 09:55 AM
whiskey??? when...where! :p
MarkTK36thIL
01-24-2004, 12:45 PM
I think this was the general concensus last time the biscuit talk came up.
Bent's (makers during the war) looks more like the originals but they are easy to eat- obviously not what the soldiers experienced.
http://www.bentscookiefactory.com/hardtack.htm
Mechanical makes theirs to be hard as the original and I believe on period equipment(don't quote me on that), but they don't look as original as Bent's. http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:LIS6EFUu3SwJ:www.mechanical-bakery.com/+mechanical+baking+company&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
My unit ordered 200 pieces from MBC, and were very satisfied. If nothing else, my dog enjoys the hardtack very much and is always ready for a piece.
flattop32355
01-24-2004, 12:48 PM
Anyone out there have the ability to set a piece of each company's product side by side and take a picture or two for the rest of us poor souls?
delawaric
01-24-2004, 01:01 PM
Anyone out there have the ability to set a piece of each company's product side by side and take a picture or two for the rest of us poor souls?
Just go to the websites posted above. They both have pictures of their product.
Eric "Woody" Woodward
ThehosGendar
01-24-2004, 01:21 PM
Here's an original for you:
http://www.3nj.org/htbox.jpg
Aquia Creek, Februaru 1863. Captain J.W. Forsyth, the Provost Marshall is seated atop it.
MarkTK36thIL
01-24-2004, 02:34 PM
Here's an original for you
Aquia Creek, Februaru 1863. Captain J.W. Forsyth, the Provost Marshall is seated atop it.
TheHos Gendar,
You amaze us all as you find everything playing around the NA site. My vote goes to you for the poster of the month if we have one.
DougCooper
01-24-2004, 03:31 PM
notice the pinky ring (wedding ring?) on the crate sitter.
Consensus is Mechanical crackers are good enough to use as building material while Bent's are edible but can turn to crumbs under 24 hr stress in a haversack. Mark Hoffman has a great solution - he mixes them up and eats the Bents early. I checked the Oracle (Hardtack and Coffee by Billings) on Mark's advice, and Billings describes both types.
Can anyone comment on the crates that Bent makes?
SCSecesh
01-24-2004, 09:29 PM
Doug,
I've bought quite a number of Bent Cracker's and while they never get as hard as MBC's, I've left the Bent Crackers out of their packaging and they became a bit less fragile than when fresh. The last set was dumped into a croaker sack and issued to 80 or men, midway on a march from Harper's Ferry to Sharpsburg in '02 - most survived in "decent" shape.
DougCooper
01-25-2004, 12:33 AM
Works for me Dave!! I still have some MBC's from about 4 years ago...when banged together they sound just like two pieces of masonry. School kids get a kick out of that :D
Bent it is!
pvt. tommy
01-25-2004, 05:08 PM
All,
I'm sure this topic was covered on the old site, but since those threads are all gone now, I'm asking again.
I'm attending an event next weekend that will have a ration issue. My question is what's the best way to prepare fresh (uncured) pork for the weekend. As I understand it, the pork will be issued in a "big hunk" to a four man mess.
I can cook it with no problem, but I've never prepared anything that I know will have to keep safely for a couple days with no refigeration. The temps here range from a low in the mid 20's to up around the mid 50's for a high.
Thanks everyone!
Tommy Rollings
8th SCVI
Palmetto Battalion
SCSecesh
01-25-2004, 10:23 PM
Since I believe I'm still supposed to help with the issue of said rations, I'll help you out but not dropping any of said hog on your plate!! :D Seriously, you can boil it with some of the forage that will be available and you should be fine - evil laugh!! :D
Tom Ezell
01-26-2004, 10:29 AM
How often were whiskey rations issued? How much would an individual recieve and how strong would it be? Also, where flasks commonly used or are they are modern type item. Thanks
Here's what the Confederate reagulations say, at least:
"1149. The following issues and substitutions may be made: When, from excessive fatigue or exposure, the commanding officer may deem it necessary, he may direct the issue of whiskey to the enlisted men of his command, not to exceed a gill per man for each day. Tea may be issued in lieu of coffee, at the rate of one and a half pounds per one hundred rations. Two "issues" per week of "desiccated vegetables," may be made in lieu of "beans" or "rice." Potatoes and onions, when issued, will always be in lieu of rice or beans. Potatoes at the rate of a pound per ration; onions at the rate of three pecks per hundred rations. A daily ration of fresh vegetables will be furnished to all the troops whenever the same can be provided at reasonable cost and charges to the government. Chaplains in the army are allowed the same rations as privates, to be issued or commuted to them as they may desire. If commuted, twenty-five cents per ration while in the field, and sixty cents per ration while stationed in a city may be allowed them. Four women will be allowed to each company as washer-women, also four cooks, and will receive one ration per day each."
ephraim_zook
01-26-2004, 11:47 AM
From the Federal Subsitance regulations:
"1205. Extra issues will be allowed as follows, viz.:
ADAMANTINE CANDLES. etc
SALT. etc.
WHISKY. One gill per man per dialy, in cases of excessive fatigue or severe exposure. The number of men issued to will be stated on each return for extra issues, and so entered on the Abstract. (Form 4.)..."
How often did this happen? I haven't seen many accounts or diary entries suggesting that this was a regular occurance.
Ron Myzie
107thman
01-27-2004, 12:20 PM
I've considered suplimenting my rations with either sausage or bacon. Does anyone have any comment or suggestions on these subjects? What about a personal sized frying pan or skillet? Other than just sticking a stick through a sausage would a frying pan be a correct way of soldierly cooking? Does anyone have a bacon and sausage supplier? :confused:
Mike, this is your second warning that you must sign all of your posts with your FULL NAME. Please comply or run the risk of loosing your priviledges here - Mike Chapman
ewtaylor
01-27-2004, 12:31 PM
You might want to check on a frying pan sold by the jerseyskilletlicker. Since most people on this forum usually reenact campaign style, a canteen half is a very popular item. It is virtually weightless and can be carried in your haversack with your food. I have used the same one for 2 years and it works great. They usually cost less than $10 and is a very good and historically correct item for both sides.
The Bacon and sausage question I'll leave to someone else as I usually get my meat rations from the QM at the event I'm attending.
hope this helps,
ewtaylor
bluegrass rifles
dusty27
01-27-2004, 12:53 PM
Frank Ellis
Rt. 1, Box 341
Greenbriar, TN 37073
615-643-4842
Frank's skillets are very good and period accurate. He has a personal size available.
As to bacon vs. sausage, I recommend slab bacon from Scotts Hams www.scotthams.com (http://www.scotthams.com) (#55) This meat needs no refrigeration and comes close to the meat the soldiers would have received on occasion.
Hope this helps
JCbluegrassrifles
01-27-2004, 12:57 PM
My pard Wayne makes a good point. Canteen halves are great for campaigners. They are cheap and 100% correct. If you are looking for frying pans, www.skilletlicker.com is a good place. Also, I'm told that Frank Ellis makes great ones.
Frank Ellis
Rt. 1, Box 341Greenbriar, TN 37073
615-643-4842
The disadvnatage of the frying pan being you would have to carry it in a knapsack and I know some don't like the discomfort. But, if you or a pard carry a pack, that works out.
As far as bacon and sausage, to me it would seem that those were foraged items or items gathered for a long encampment, much like the feds at Pittsburg Landing. Your best bet is to go with salt pork as that is what was issued. There are times when foraged items are proper, but that depends on the scenario. If you are attending an event where rations are not issued, then it saves time and effort to prepare meats prior to leaving for the event. We all know grunts carried their 3-5 days rations with them, so preapring them when issued would help prevent spoil, and for you, you've got cooked pork ready for munching that weekend.
Skeet
01-27-2004, 01:00 PM
The only thing I would carry in my haversack is salt pork or side meat. Here in the valley it is easy to get at any country store. I agree that the canteen half is the most historically accurate. I most definetly would not carry regular bacon or sausage to an event, I have seen someone pull out of his haversack bacon in plastic wrap! The shame! Stick to the basics! Pvt.Dan Morgan, 10th VA
tarheelpvt
01-27-2004, 01:02 PM
I agree with EWTaylor. Stick with the canteen half. Less is better. Supplementing your rations with sausage or bacon? Mostly my rations consist of one hunk of slab bacon, some corn meal or a tater for the weekend. As I said before less is better.
Dave Foytlin
Full Moon Mess
tarheelpvt
01-27-2004, 01:12 PM
On a second thought about a supplier of bacon or sausage. If you happen to have a Farmers Market near you. That is the best place to look. At the Raleigh NC Farmers Market you can pretty much buy any part of the hog you want.
Dave Foytlin
Full Moon Mess
10TnVI
01-27-2004, 02:09 PM
Mike-On the matter of cooking utensils- both small sheet steel frying pans and canteen halfs are 'authentic'.Both have advantages and disadvantages. The question to ask is which would you be willing to carry 12 miles a day. Is the utility worth the extra weight to you.
On the matter of meat- Sausages are period appropriate, usually the hard varities but 'loose meat' was not unknown- two citations on the subject
In "Some of the boys' the C.W. letters of Issac Jackson-in a letter to his father from Natches, Mississippi- requested his father send him
2 qt cans of butter, 2 of mollasses, 1 of tomatoes and 1 can of sausage meat.
from "From Antietum to Fort Fisher", the C.W. Letters of Edward K. Wightman(9th NY/3rdNY)-in a letter written from Gates Mill, Va. he discussed the contents of a proposed box from home- "Then for eatables you may send cheese, Germanbread(schwarzbrod), German Sausages(the big fellows that are eaten in slices), solid cake or gingerbread of a kind that will keep, cayenne pepper, any sort of sweetmeats that go well with crackers(in short broad-mouthed bottles or tumblers), dough-nuts...."
Many sutler inventories also list bologna sausages as an item.
Check your local store, many will carry 'country bacon' in vacumn packed wrapping. Don't forget that frequently they were issued or procred fresh meat. Boil beef or pork at home before you leave and it will keep easily over the average event. Just remember to reheat it enough to kill any stray bacteria.
From "This Wilderness of War" the C.W. letters of George W. Squier
Letter dated Dec. 4, 1862, entry dated Dec. 5, 1862. The 44th Ind was on pickett duty at the time
"...Lieut. Wayne came to camp to day and brought 10 loaves of bread. fortunatly we had just drawn beef, so we had quite a feest(sic)- soft bread and steak. Our usual fare is hard bread, "sow belly" and coffee..."
Letter dated Dec. 8, 1862 from Nashville.
"Not long since, Gen. Debility(alias Van Cleve) was riding along(this he was telling Crittenden), came up on the 13th Ohio, and saw them dressing a hog as they was marching. He came up top the 44th, saw them skin, dress, cut up and put in their haversacks a sheep without losing a step."
Letter dated Jan.5, 1863 discussing his units approach to Murfreesboro on Dec. 26, 1862
"About <?> o'clock I heard a solitary cock, more wakeful than his brothers, give one loud, long, but unfortunate crow.Now there was little sleepfor any of the boys. From that time until day light all hands were busily engaged in catching, picking,roasting without salt, and eating.... Chickens, ducks
& turkeys, with an occasional fine mutton, all nicely dressed, hung suspended from almost every tree, while beneath them was feathers to the right of us, feathers to the left of us, feathers in front of us, feathers in rear of us."
Barclay
01-27-2004, 02:26 PM
Geez Dusty, you are starting to sound knowledgeable on the subject of cooking! ;) Now, if we can only teach you how to actually cook the food instead of just posting on the internet about it! :D (my apologies Sir, I am feeling ornery today)
The material where Dusty found this information is available on www.wythegrays.org - under the article "Cooking on Campaign with the Stonewall Brigade" - obviously Confederate, but some good info for Federals as well.
-Bret Sumner
Frank Ellis
Rt. 1, Box 341
Greenbriar, TN 37073
615-643-4842
Frank's skillets are very good and period accurate. He has a personal size available.
As to bacon vs. sausage, I recommend slab bacon from Scotts Hams www.scotthams.com (http://www.scotthams.com) (#55) This meat needs no refrigeration and comes close to the meat the soldiers would have received on occasion.
Hope this helps
Foggy Bottom Jim
01-27-2004, 03:27 PM
I have had good luck finding twice smoked slab bacon at International or German delicattesens in my area. They come in reasonable sizes for a few pards and you don't have to buy a whole slab. It's initially wrapped in plastic but I just stick it in the fridge til it's time to go and then remove the plastic and wrap it in brown paper. It doesn't make as much fat as salt port to fry up some skilleygally but the meat tasts better IMHO. The deli is also a good place to get dried German sausage like Landjaeger which is a dried sausage that will keep through an event and doesn't need cooking. This would be a foraged item of course in an area where there were well...Germans. It could perhaps be a sutler purchased as well. On an event where we have humped a long way I have taken a few each of Landjaegers, dried apples, hardtack and essence of coffee. This leaves room in my haversack for event issued rations. If issued rations are short, I can live on the above plus my modular food storage system (beer gut).
Jim Reynolds
Silas
01-27-2004, 10:21 PM
I second the opinion about cooking rations before you go to the event. Makes your job simplier in the long run as you eat when you're hungry, not when you have the time to stoke a fire.
If there's a ration issue at an event, cook it all immediately upon receipt or upon sitting at the first fire you see. This isn't so much for sanitary reasons as for ease of handling. I love the stains in my haversack, but don't care for the mixing of the juice with other things found therein.
On a side note, it seems the discussion has obliqued from your question about sausage to answers about sausages. By "sausage", it seems you mean a pork product like Jimmy Dean, for example. It's not impossible for a soldier to have obtained sausage - likely foraged - but I have not seen the term, sausage, used on requisitions. I haven't looked hard for it either.
I do recall a thread a couple years ago in this forum which was entitled, "Is that a sausage in your pocket ..." I believe Paul Calloway initially posted it. Basically, the thread included some period accounts, an advertisement, and/or a requisition for sausages. The idea being that sausages cost less to ship and provided more usable product, pound for pound, than beef cattle. Based upon that thread, I've purchased sausages instead of a pork product for events if I didn't have time to cook meat before I left. Much easier to cook a few sausages in the dark for a day's ration than several slices of thick sliced bacon. (It's hard to find good salt pork in cosmopolitan Seattle although the stuff sold in Chinatown is pretty tempting.)
I've never favored fry pans due to size. I've used a canteen half for many years, but just switched to a copper plate over the winter.
Vuhginyuh
01-27-2004, 11:17 PM
Don't forget the ham! This is the salty ''country'' variety.
These cured slices (Wayco Old Southern Hams) will keep a few days un-refridgerated if kept dry.
http://waycohams.com
Can I use a slice as my Avatar?
flattop32355
01-28-2004, 12:40 AM
[B]Don't forget the ham! This is the salty ''country'' variety. These cured slices (Wayco Old Southern Hams) will keep a few days un-refridgerated if kept dry.
Now, here we go with the "authenticity" debate again! It's my understanding that soldiers' rations weren't all that tasty, and anyone who ever was blessed with a bite of country ham knows that that is just another name for Nectar of the Gods. :D
Clark Badgett
01-28-2004, 08:50 AM
Woohoo, next time I do Perryville. I'm gonna stuff my haversack with sausages. Since the federal troops mostly came from Louisville, and this town is still full of folks of German decent ;)
Vuhginyuh
01-28-2004, 10:05 AM
An abstract stating the cost of goods for contract listed; bacon, fresh pork, salt pork and lard, all fat and good, from $3.25 lb for the fresh meat to $5.00 lb for cured meats and lard.
Richmond Va July 13, 1864
O.R. Series I-Volume XL-Part III pps 766, 767
adam_oswalt
01-28-2004, 06:37 PM
I was talking at work today about period meat packing and was trying to make comparisons to the modern day method, when I realized that I can stand to learn a little more about the subject. I've read bits and peices, but I can't fill in the details.
I doubt the method has changed a whole lot in 100+ years except for the inspection process, so my question is really more about the technology. In a regular butcher shop, how was beef killed? Was it knocked in the head as it is today? I've seen pictures of the hammers in the 18th century and the guy in the "yankee laundress" picture looks like he's holding a similar object.
The next question I have is whether or not the whole beef was split once it was gutted and skinned. That's how it's done now, but I can't imagine doing it by hand.
Thanks for any information that's posted. I'm sorry it got a little gross there, but it's not exactly a pleasant subject.
Adam Oswalt
markj
01-28-2004, 07:43 PM
Hi Adam,
When it came to butchering in camp one of the very first orders issued by none other than August Willich himself, upon assuming command of his brigade in August 1862, was that all animals were to "be killed with the knife." That means slitting their throats.
Willich issued this order because his troops had a nasty habit of shooting hogs and cattle while in camp. Very convenient...but it played hell with the pickets: There was only one thing more terrifying than receiving fire from your front; that was the sound of firing coming from your REAR.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Alamo Guard
01-29-2004, 07:06 AM
Speaking of sausages, I remember somewhere of the Texas Brigade buying sausages from a local vendor. The men were digusted to find a tooth and claw from a cat in the sausages.
We have a large german and polish community here in south Texas. Dry sausage is everywhere. It will last for months if stored properly. As far as fresh sausage due to its fat content I would never even consider taking some out for a weekend due to its quick shelf life and bacteria.
Most of the dry sausages were made in natural casings consequently they would be smaller than the cold cuts we see today.
Too bad the wonderful discussion on period bologna was deleted. There was a trove of useful information.
va-yank
01-29-2004, 04:18 PM
In one of the other threads about bacon/sausage the topic of correct period skillets came up. Someone said the Skillet Licker is a good source. I have not been able to locate a skillet among Joe Hoffman's wares, nor do I think he has had them on his site in the past. I could be wrong.
Please feel free to post sources for closely matching or period correct skillets small enough for a soldier to hump in this thread. I had once bought a modern stamped steel item and long ago discarded it, never to be replaced.
Also: On some forum, maybe this one, there was a thread some time ago about "spiders", the cooking variety. I don't know if we ever reached consensus on one soldierly item that was the canonical spider or not. But this might be a good place to revisit that if anyone is so inclined.
dusty27
01-29-2004, 04:27 PM
Fred,
As I said in the bacon thread, Mr. Ellis's pans are very accurate and his "personal" size, smallest, will fit easily in your haversack for a VERY reasonable price.
Vuhginyuh
01-29-2004, 04:29 PM
Fred,
I have spider (trivet) with a strong NCT provenance. Forged, with fixed legs but still very portable.
A canteen half, small to medium skillet or boiler fit easily upon it.
Ill take a shot and send it to you if you would like one. If you have any luck posting images and want to share it, feel free to do so.
DougCooper
01-29-2004, 05:26 PM
Frank Ellis
3031 Possum Trot Rd
Greenbrier, TN 37073-5741
gotta love that address...
7", 9" and 11" inch ultra correct skillets. I have the 11" cause my pards are cheap (don't have one) and throw their food into mine as well. Seriously, the 11" fits easily under your knapsacks straps or tied to the blanket roll...and weighs not a whit. The most you will spend is about $28 total - a great deal.
va-yank
01-29-2004, 05:38 PM
"I have spider (trivet) with a strong NCT provenance. Forged, with fixed legs but still very portable.
Ill take a shot and send it to you. If you have any luck posting images and want to share it, feel free to do so."
Garrison, So your spider is a trivet... Yes, please post any pics, info.
IN the earlier discussion we got sidelined re the definition of a spider. My experience as a camper, years ago, was that a spider was more of a trivet to allow one to cook in the coals. Others insist that a spider is a legged skillet, stewpot or cauldron. I am sure we are all right.
Anyone have references to spiders/frypans/trivets in original source material? This subject was mined previously too.
Rice Bull in his memoir Soldiering mentions the division of labor among messmates, or comrades in arms. One carrying a hatchet, one a spider and one a skillet. This image of spider his description conjured for me was of a folding trivet. But I could be way off.
Vuhginyuh
01-29-2004, 06:51 PM
Fred,
I agree with your conclusion about the spider being an iron trivet to raise a cooking vessel above the coals.
We called a cooking trivet or grate a spider in Scouts. I too know folks who stand behind it being a pan with legs. The results are the same. The trivet is just more versitile.(A legged cooking pot is often called a ''grape")
I think it is a non-objective question that relies on time and place for usage.
straggler
01-29-2004, 08:40 PM
Just after the AC moved to this new server a question was asked
regarding skillets. At that time I posted a picture of a pair of Mr. Ellis'
skillets I have - one 7 inch; one 9 inch.
So if you go back to 1/01/04 you can click on the fingernail pic to see
a larger image.
Based on the scales at my local post office the 7" was just under 10
ounces, the 11 inch about one pound one ounce.
Alamo Guard
01-30-2004, 07:17 AM
Spiders were used for a long time. There is ample mention of use by american forces in the Rev. War forward. A spider is called such because of the legs it has.
I have read past accounts of men taking the metal staves off some barrel and having them heated and rolled into small joined circles. They look like the modern burners you see on stoves. These were kept in mess chests and used for grilling meats and such. The height of the metal stave "grillers" elevated the item to be cooked off the coals.
hireddutchcutthroat
01-30-2004, 03:23 PM
Fred,
I agree with your conclusion about the spider being an iron trivet to raise a cooking vessel above the coals.
We called a cooking trivet or grate a spider in Scouts. I too know folks who stand behind it being a pan with legs. The results are the same. The trivet is just more versitile.(A legged cooking pot is often called a ''grape")
I think it is a non-objective question that relies on time and place for usage.
Could you guys post photos of these articles, I have no idea what they are.
Also I carried Doug´s skillet up Lookout Mountain, It doesnt weigh anything and it was very useful.
Vuhginyuh
01-31-2004, 06:24 PM
'Possom Time (Translations available for those Unfortunates North of the Tappahannock )
Oh, dip some ‘taters down in grease
En fling de dogs a ‘tater apiece.
Ram yo’ brogans clean ter de tacks,
Split de splinters en fetch de ax.
It’s ‘possum time again!
Catfish tender, catfish tough,
We’s done et catfish long enough.
We’s tar’d er collards en white-side meat,
En we’s gwine have supp’n wut’s good to eat.
It’s ‘possum time again!
De pot’s gwine simmer en blubber en bile
Till it gits scummed over wid ‘possum ile.
But le’ ‘s don’t brag till we gits de goods.
Whoop! Come along, boys! We’s off to de woods.
It’s ‘possum time again!
John Charles McNeill
Deep in the Sandhills of North Carolina
... makes me homesick...
billwatson
01-31-2004, 11:28 PM
Merriam Webster
*Main Entry: spi·der
Pronunciation: 'spI-d&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English spyder, alteration of spithre; akin to Old English spinnan to spin
snip
2 : a cast-iron frying pan orig. made with short feet to stand among coals on the hearth
If this is garbled, my apologies, the website is still adjusting to my computer screen. :-)
Vuhginyuh
01-31-2004, 11:41 PM
Could you guys post photos of these articles, I have no idea what they are.
Also I carried Doug´s skillet up Lookout Mountain, It doesnt weigh anything and it was very useful.
I could'nt get an image to load with a drop-forged, three-pound, ball-peen hammer.
dusty27
01-31-2004, 11:54 PM
http://www.journalofantiques.com/hearthjan01.htm
This website has pictures of "spiders"
Vuhginyuh
02-01-2004, 12:07 AM
http://www.journalofantiques.com/hearthjan01.htm
This website has pictures of "spiders"
As does this one; http://www.giantspiders.com/
You don't want one of these boogers in yer kit.
Vuhginyuh
02-01-2004, 12:17 AM
Here's a spider too, says so on the handle. Sky-Line Drive,no doubt Reb issue.
And the hammer worked on the keyboard too. I highly recommend it.
flattop32355
02-01-2004, 01:05 AM
I think I'll stick to the country ham. :D
Vuhginyuh
02-01-2004, 01:22 AM
De pot’s gwine simmer en blubber en bile - BOIL
Till it gits scummed over wid ‘possum ile. - OIL
Now, that should be more appetizing...
markj
02-02-2004, 06:38 PM
Greetings,
No guarantees for this recipe but it looks pretty interesting:
MEMPHIS DAILY APPEAL [GRENADA, MS], July 24, 1862, p. 1, c. 7
To make hard tallow candles.--Wm. Summer, of Pomaria, S. C., furnishes the following to the Charleston Courier:
To one pound of tallow take five or six leaves of the prickly pear, (cactus opuntia,) split them and boil in the tallow, without water, for half an hour of more; strain and mould the candles. The wicks should have previously dipped in spirits of turpentine and dried.
If the tallow at first is boiled in water, and the water changed four or five times, it will be bleached and rendered free from impurities. Then prepare, by frying with prickly pears, to harden it.
In this way we have made tallow candles nearly equal to the best adamantine.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
markj
02-02-2004, 07:06 PM
Greetings,
Here's another recipe:
MOBILE REGISTER AND ADVERTISER, October 11, 1862, p. 1, c. 4
[For the Evening News]
Tallow Candles Equal to Star.
Messrs. Editors: It may be of interest to your numerous readers to know that, with not a cent of additional expense, tallow candles can be made fully equal in point of merit to the common star candle.
To two pounds of tallow add one teacupful of good strong lye from wood ashes, and simmer over a slow fire—when a greasy scum will float on top; skim this off for making soap, (it is very near soap already) as long as it continues to rise. Then mould your candles as usual, making the wicks a little smaller—and you have a pure, hard tallow candle, worth knowing how to make—and one that burns as long and gives a light equal to sperm. The chemistry demonstrates itself. An ounce or two of beeswax will make the candle some harder, and steeping the wicks in spirits turpentine will make it burn some brighter. I write with one before me.
Yours, W.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Vuhginyuh
02-02-2004, 07:28 PM
What about spermaceti?
I'm sure they are not easy to come by...
Ok, SHUT UP all you Bevis and Butthead fans I can here the sad little comments and chuckles from here.
What I meant is the white, waxy substance consisting of various esters of fatty acids, obtained from the head of the sperm whale or another cetacean and used for making candles, ointments, and cosmetics. That is really not much better is it?
The curator of archaeology at Colonial Williamsburg stated that spermaceti candles were the most common store bought type from about 1820 to 1900 and quite impossible to obtain today.
Vuhginyuh
02-02-2004, 11:39 PM
Here is a TRIVET belonging to Nathan Byron Parker and Richard Brite Parker Co. A, 27th North Carolina Troops. It is roughly 6'' across, 10'' long and 1 5/8'' high.
hireddutchcutthroat
02-03-2004, 12:34 PM
I could'nt get an image to load with a drop-forged, three-pound, ball-peen hammer.
Try a trip hammer!
coffee boiler
02-04-2004, 12:12 AM
As already pointed out, the term “spider” has an inconsistent usage. When this was discussed about a year ago, one poster pointed out that where he grew up a “spider” was just another term for a regular frying pan as opposed to the more proper usage of a frying pan with three legs. I suspect that when Rice wrote about the common practice of soldiers carrying “spiders” that he is really referring to a regular old frying pan, as I am not aware of archaeological evidence to support anything else.
From “Soldiering – The Civil War Diary of Rice C. Bull, 123rd New York Volunteer Infantry” edited by K. Jack Bauer and published by Presidio Press.
October 1863
“Many changes had been made in their camp life and they were living very differently then when I left them at Aquia Creek. There were now no company cooks; rations were issued directly to the men and they prepared their own food. The three men who occupied a tent formed a mess, pooled their rations and did their own cooking. This plan proved to be most efficient as in this way a meal could be quickly had when needed. The only mess utensils required were a spider, coffee pot, and hatchet; each man had one article to carry. Under this system of feeding the men were more independent, well satisfied, and much better fed.”
va-yank
02-04-2004, 12:28 AM
I stand corrected, Rice does not mention a fry pan but a spider. Ok, so we begin to assume that fry pan and spider are interchangable. Guess this an instance of my modern world interpretation of camp cooking equipment forming my mental picture of a spider.
Still interested in the trivet that Garrison shows as having a North Carolina CW provenance. Although it may be a real one of a kind relic.
Vuhginyuh
02-04-2004, 01:09 AM
Here is a TRIVET belonging to Nathan Byron Parker and Richard Bright Parker Co. A, 27th North Carolina Troops. It is roughly 6'' across, 10'' long and 1 5/8'' high.
Neuman and Kravic's Collector's Illustrated Encyclopedia of the American Revolution refers to the artifacts in question as ''Three-legged skillets". Nothing more. (p 91, Cookingware). Two fine examples are shown along with broilers, braziers, trivets, toasters and cast pots. They are forged sheet iron and appeared to be lighter weight than the modern examples shown below.
Several 19th and early 20th century examples actually have the word SPIDER embossed in the handle.
This could be another example of a style being identified by a common makers name. (See attachment)
As to the reference to this post being addressed a year earlier, well, I'm new to the forum and do not have the old posts to refer to. Pardon my lack of experience and knowledge of those things hashed out before.
coffee boiler
02-04-2004, 09:20 AM
Echo's of Glory has a picture of a soldier holding a cast iron spider in front of a log cabin. But I can't image these being routinely carried by the soldiers because of their weight. That is why I suspect that Rice is really referring to the common soldier's frying pan and not a cast iron spider.
Jimmayo
02-04-2004, 09:40 AM
Here is a picture of a Dutch oven or "spider" ( take your pick) cover found in a 1862 camp of the 57th Va. It is hard to read but the firm that made this looks like Snyder of Richmond Va. I think we can all agree that one would not like to tote the bottom half of this cooking device any distance. Probably carried along in the camp wagon and would have been left in camp or stored for spring and summer campaigns. Usage may also have been limited in CS service later in the war due to other consideratiions. Like wise, frying pans with legs poking out would also be hard to carry and would have likely been carried in a wagon. From parts of frying pans I have found and others I have seen, soldiers were cooking with small frying pans with no legs and wrought iron handles while on the march. A large version on one of these can be seen in in the background of one of the pictures posted recently of Union soldiers removing a cannon from Confederate works at Petersburg.
Vuhginyuh
02-04-2004, 10:00 AM
Here is a picture of a Dutch oven or "spider" ( take your pick) cover found in a 1862 camp of the 57th Va. It is hard to read but the firm that made this looks like Snyder of Richmond Va. I think we can all agree that one would not like to tote the bottom half of this cooking device any distance. Probably carried along in the camp wagon and would have been left in camp or stored for spring and summer campaigns. Usage may also have been limited in CS service later in the war due to other consideratiions. Like wise, frying pans with legs poking out would also be hard to carry and would have likely been carried in a wagon. From parts of frying pans I have found and others I have seen, soldiers were cooking with small frying pans with no legs and wrought iron handles while on the march. A large version on one of these can be seen in in the background of one of the pictures posted recently of Union soldiers removing a cannon from Confederate works at Petersburg.
Very nice, thank you Jim.
Vuhginyuh
02-04-2004, 10:09 AM
One thing not discussed in this thread is the ''mess'' theory.
The heart of this is: Share the food, Share the duties at the fire, Share the weight.
I like the use of a fork mention above to handle the skillet without a handle.
A cloth works well too. Plus any soldier used to cooking on coals adjacent to an open fire or hearth should have more heat tolerance than we do.
Vuhginyuh
02-04-2004, 10:15 AM
One thing not discussed in this thread is the ''mess'' theory.
The heart of this is: Share the food, Share the duties at the fire, Share the weight.
I like the use of a fork mention above to handle the skillet without a handle.
A cloth works well too. Plus any soldier used to cooking on coals adjacent to an open fire or hearth should have more heat tolerance than we do.
Did someone ask the best way to cook on these things?
I have a great deal of experience cooking on forged and cast iron critters like these if anyone is interested.
We have a cooking hearth in an early out-building kitchen.
Enfilade
02-04-2004, 10:40 AM
I think through one of our guy's research on this subject we found only one reference to "spiders" in the wagons behind the line of march.
Were they around? Certainly. In the CMH newsletter I've read about them in Rev War being even more in use. The problem is that unless you're using an original, they aren't correct. The reason they aren't correct is because today's method of cast iron manufacturing is much different than it was then. The method changed about 1880's-ish. We can , however, get much closer to camp cookware by using the sheet metal cooking implements. That's what we do. I would love to cook some hominy in a cast iron spider if we could get the molten poured right in a cast iron mold. It would be distinctive with a line down the middle of the bottom. I believe Hank Trent posted a picture of this last time this subject came up.
Mark Berrier
North State Rifles
combinations@northstate.net
Vuhginyuh
02-04-2004, 11:02 AM
I think through one of our guy's research on this subject we found only one reference to "spiders" in the wagons behind the line of march.
Were they around? Certainly. In the CMH newsletter I've read about them in Rev War being even more in use. The problem is that unless you're using an original, they aren't correct. The reason they aren't correct is because today's method of cast iron manufacturing is much different than it was then. The method changed about 1880's-ish. We can , however, get much closer to camp cookware by using the sheet metal cooking implements. That's what we do. I would love to cook some hominy in a cast iron spider if we could get the molten poured right in a cast iron mold. It would be distinctive with a line down the middle of the bottom. I believe Hank Trent posted a picture of this last time this subject came up.
Mark Berrier
North State Rifles
combinations@northstate.net
From post # 19 above
“Neuman and Kravic's Collector's Illustrated Encyclopedia of the American Revolution refers to the artifacts in question as ''Three-legged skillets". Nothing more. (p 91, Cookingware). Two fine examples are shown along with broilers, braziers, trivets, toasters and cast pots. They are forged sheet iron and appeared to be lighter weight than the modern examples…”
This is a great reference with 19th century applications as well.
You can find it for sale at:
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=2U5A6HP26I&isbn=0960566678&itm=12
Moonshine
02-04-2004, 11:06 AM
Didn't Sam Watkins say something about a guy in his company that carried one in his knapsack? I asked this question before the "meltdown" because I got a cast iron spider (like the one pictured in EoG Confed) off eBay and was inquiring if any one actually had reference of someone toting this beast around. I got "Co. Aytch" as a reference yet I don't recall the exact passage.
Jim Ross
Hank Trent
02-04-2004, 11:53 AM
The problem is that unless you're using an original, they aren't correct. The reason they aren't correct is because today's method of cast iron manufacturing is much different than it was then. The method changed about 1880's-ish. We can , however, get much closer to camp cookware by using the sheet metal cooking implements. That's what we do. I would love to cook some hominy in a cast iron spider if we could get the molten poured right in a cast iron mold. It would be distinctive with a line down the middle of the bottom. I believe Hank Trent posted a picture of this last time this subject came up.
You're talking about gate marks, and I think the pictures I posted may have been from current eBay sales. A search on eBay for "gate mark" and "cast iron" or some similar combination may turn up some examples, since sellers like to show off the mark to collectors.
Original cast iron is lighter, and does generally have gate marks, and it's unfortunately in that vague gray area for putting originals at risk. It's pretty sturdy, but it's potentially breakable--like using an original gun. In most situations, I agree that we can recreate an 1860s world without cast iron, but there are some contexts where it's appropriate to use cast iron, and in those cases some decision needs to be made about what's accurate enough vs. affordable enough vs. responsible enough, at the current state of reproductions. No easy answer.
My wife and I use original cast iron in a controllable indoor environment, but even where it's historically appropriate, I wouldn't take originals out where there's more risk of them getting knocked around and broken, like in a wagon, and in that case would accept the use of reasonable reproductions (without, say, a large modern logo embossed no them). Others might never use originals, or use them regardless of risk, just depends.
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
markj
02-04-2004, 12:06 PM
Hi,
Has anyone had any trouble receiving items from Frank Ellis? I ordered a skillet from him over a month ago and have not, as yet, received it. Does he sometimes run into production bottlenecks?
Thanks,
Mark Jaeger
CSA Engineer
02-04-2004, 02:10 PM
Good Day Pards--I want to make an Authentic looking box to hold all my gear and extras while at events. Does any one know of a good source on how to build one, or have some tips on this? Thanks in Advance...
Pvt. Michael Moffett
Co. E 3rd Regiment
Confederate Engineers
Curt-Heinrich Schmidt
02-04-2004, 04:00 PM
Hallo Herr Michael!
Welcome to the AC Forum!
I will assume you are requesting information on "engineer" type impressions, and not on wooden storage boxes for infantry as that would be neither "authentic" nor "campaigner" and not approppriate for this forum.
Curt-Heinrich Schmidt
Moderator
CSA Engineer
02-04-2004, 04:22 PM
Your assumption would be correct, sorry for not making that clear. To clarify I am with an Engineer Company, and an Engineering impression is what I will be using the box for. Most of the guys in my unit have these "wooden"types of boxes for their gear. I was just wondering if any one knows of a good source on how to make my own Authentic Box. I asked the guys in my unit and I get a mixed bag of responses, so I hoped I would get a better idea by posting my questions here. Thanks again for any and all information!
Pvt. Michael Moffett
Co. E 3rd Regiment
Confederate Engineers
K Bartsch
02-04-2004, 05:07 PM
Michael,
I think it would help if we knew what you needed to store. Are we talking surveying equipment for a topographical engineers impression or are we talking picks, mattocks and shovels? Either way, we kind of need to know what kind of gear you're talking about. If its personal equipment, I agree w/Curt that it shouldn't be in boxes. It should be in a knapsack or bedroll.
Good rule of thumb to keep in mind is if you need a box for the extra "stuff' you're probably bringing too much.
Cordially,
K. Bartsch
hireddutchcutthroat
02-04-2004, 05:37 PM
I guess the next thing to do after you know what kind of equipment you are going to store, would be to track down a surviving original or plans of an original to copy. I would look through the ORs and maybe contact the MOC.
Yellowhammer
02-04-2004, 08:02 PM
Not trying to be difficult here, but wouldn't implements be carried in a wagon or on your shoulder?
Other than delicate instruments like surveying tool or optics, I'm not sure what "gear and extras" an engineer company would be crated.
Johan Steele
02-04-2004, 10:59 PM
As a note to this discussion I recently saw two originall hardtack boxes that had been converted into useful tool chests. I don't know if this was done during or after the war but the work was quite nicely done. And both boxes were quite robust.
Each hardtack box had been lined w/ what looked like cedar shingles and compartments had been created in this way. The lid had been hinged by the addition of leather hinges and handles had been created by riveting (I believe that's how they were attached but I'm not certain) a partial horseshoe to each end. I was very suprised when I realized what the tool boxes had been originally. The printing was faded but still legible as was a pair of painted on crossed sabres (though they were faded enough that they may have been either cannons or hatchets w/ what appeared to be either a farriers insignia or a badly faded number above, this marking was actually more faded than the original markings. I'm kicking myself for not dishing out the $ to buy them as I think it would have been an interesting show piece... but I have a house payment, bills and a family to feed.
Sigh, I hate responsability getting in the way of the hobby.
BrianHicks
02-04-2004, 11:04 PM
If I recall correctly, it was Co. E, Conf. Engineers that always had several boxes of various kinds when I had seen them at the Riley's Farm events, and the Vista Steam Engine Museum event. Signaling lamps and other engineer related equipment seemed to be what was stored in them (if I remember correctly).
CSA Engineer
02-05-2004, 11:13 AM
Yes Brian, your memory serves you correctly.My intent for the Box was to utilize it for my Engineering equipment, in the same manner that you have mentioned. I do not intend to make so large as to store pics shovels and the like in it, I was mainly thinking something roughly the same size as a hard tack box. I dont want it so large that it would take 2 men to lift it! Again thanks to all for the help.
Pvt. Michael Moffett
Co. E 3rd Regiment
Confederate Engineers
Yellowhammer
02-05-2004, 07:49 PM
Since you just need storage boxes for whatever it is you are storing, why don't you just make some cracker boxes?
Why would engineers have signal lamps? Pardon my ignorance, but I thought such implements would have been in use by the Signal Corps.
RLSchwartz
02-08-2004, 11:47 PM
I'm tired of burning beeswax candles! Anyone have a source for tallow ones...?
Much appreciated in advance for any help!
Jim Ross
Mr. Ross,
Perhaps this period newspaper article will help you with your research.
Regards,
Robin Schwartz
~~~~~~~~~
LOUISVILLE DAILY JOURNAL, November 19, 1862.
[Note: There are actually two tables with this article. Table I compares “The Relative Cost to Consumers of the Illuminating Materials in Use in Lafayette, Indiana.” Table I was very difficult to read from the photocopy I used for my transcription. Therefore, I only transcribed part of it below.
The candles mentioned in Table I (column 1 – type of candle, column 2 – origin) are:]
Red wax candles (4’s), from Josiah Macy, N.Y.;
Green wax candles (fragment) from Josiah Macy;
Paraffine candles (6’s) [origin not clear, perhaps Macy?];
Tallow candles (6’s) from “E.T. Jenks, Lafay’tte”;
Sperm candles (4’s) “10 years old”;
Star candles (6’s) from Cornwall & Brother, London;
Star candles (4’s) (10 years old) from Werk & Co., Cin[cinnati];
Star candles (6’s) Proctor & Gamble, C[incinnati];
Star candles (6’s) Dennis & Co., N.Y. Cincinnati.
The cost of lb. of candles by count (column 3), cost of “real” lb. (column 4) and melting point of the candles (column 6) was:
Red wax $0 50 $0 562 117-115 degrees
Green wax --- --- 115-113 “
Paraffine $0 60 $0 689 129-126 “
Tallow $0 13 $0 161 117-198 1/2 “
Sperm $0 46 $0 430 117-113 “
Star [C&B] $0 25 $0 303 127-115 “
Star [Werk] $0 25 $0 277 138-131 “
Star [P&G] $0 25 $0 253 131-122 “
Star [Dennis] $0 25 $0 254 120-117 “
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C A N D L E S.
[Table 2]
The candles tested were purchase at different places, at the retail prices noted in column 3 of the above table. Having weighed a pound, _by count_, of each, its price for a true pound was calculated, giving the results of column 4. The following numbers represent the thickness of the respective candles at the base, with the nature of their wicks:
Thickness of No. of Strands No. of Threads in
Candle--Inch in Wicks Each Strand
Wax, red 7-8 3 loosely braided. 21
Wax, green 13-16 3 loosely braided. 24
Paraffine 7-8 3 braided. 16
Tallow 13-16 Twisted. 21
Sperm 7-8 2 twisted. 18
Star [C&B] 27-32 3 braided. 2[?illeg.]
Star [Werk] 13-16 3 braided. 27
Star [P&G] 13-16 3 braided. 24
Star [Dennis] 13-16 3 braided. 24
The degree of fineness of the threads composing the above wicks varied, the tallow wick being as usual very coarse. The star candles arranged themselves in the following order in this respect, proceeding from finest to coarsest threads: Werk & Co., Dennis & Co., Procter & Gamble, Cornwall & Brother. The wick of Werk & Co. was uneven and tightly braided; that of Procter & Gamble not uniform in thickness of braid. The threads of the Paraffine were the finest of all the wicks.
When the candles were all viewed burning together, the flame of the paraffine at once signalized itself by the shortness, superior whiteness, and steadiness of its flame. The cup formed at the top of the candle is deep, and of sharply defined edge. This candle would make an admirable photometric standard, especially since the fineness of the wick would diminish its disturbing action upon the flame.
Of the star candles, the Cornwall burned in the most satisfactory manner, and the Dennis & Co. in the least so, the latter flickering and running much. The Procter a& Gamble candle burned well , but with a tendency to run and flare. The Werk & Co. candle was satisfactory in the manner of its burning, but gave less light than the others. This candle, ten years old, was the whitest and fairest in material of all the stars. That of Dennis & Co. was the _greasiest_. The latter candle is marked “chemical sperm,” and is doubtless a mixture of stearic aid, with unsaponified fat. An alteration of the wick would no doubt render the candles of Procter & Gamble, and those of Werk & Co., equal in every respect to the best star candle.
As may be seen by Table I, the star candles vary very much in cost to the consumer.
A count lb. of Cornwall & Bro. candle weighed 5,767 grains.
“ “ Procter & Gamble candle weighed 6,903 “
“ “ Werk & Co. “ “ 6,316 “
“ “ Dennis & Co. “ “ 6,886 “
instead of 7,000 grains. As Procter & Gamble advertise their candles as of full weight, I weighed samples from two different boxes with the above result.
The deficiency of weight of the other candles is as follows – a lb. by count, instead of 7,000 grains weight:
Of wax, red. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,224 Tallow . . . . . . . . . . . 6,498
Paraffine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,096 Sperm . . . . . . . . . . . 6,500
The cost of the candles is also influenced by the different rapidity with which they burn. See Table I. [note: I did not transcribe all of Table I. RS] From column 9, which represents the hourly actual cost of burning the several lights, it is seen that the Cornwall & Werk candles cost nearly alike, viz.: almost 7 mills; that the Procter & Gamble candle is the cheapest being worth a little over 6 mills; while the Dennis candle is the dearest of all the stars. The sperm candle costs 9 mills per hour, and the Paraffine, at the price received here, is the dearest of all candles. The tallow candle is the cheapest of all the lights in actual cost of burning – a little over 3 mills per hour; but its light, at the very best, is only ¾ that of the star; and with a long snuff, as they are frequently seen, the light is 1/10th that of the star candle.
If we combine the quantity of light with its cost, the Procter & Gamble candle is cheaper than the Cornwall by about ½ mill a per hour; but if we take into account the waste from the facility of running of the former candle, the Cornwall will be found superior to all of the star candles which I have examined. If a tallow candle be kept constantly snuffed, its cost for equal light is less than that of the star candle; but, as usually burned, its cost surpasses that of the sperm, and equals that of the expensive paraffine; while, as frequently seen with a long snuff, its cost surpasses that of all other light. Ure [Dr. Ure, scientist] found that a tallow candle unsnuffed loses in intensity of light, “in 30 minutes 80/100ths, in 39 minutes 86/100ths, in which dim state it remains stationary,” with which observation my own accords.
Reference to the melting points demonstrates that the sperm candle tested was perfectly pure. These points were determined in the usual manner, by inclosing the substance in a capillary tube tied to the bulb of a thermometer, which was placed first in water gradually heated, and then gradually cooled, determining first the temperature for perfect limpidity, and then that for perfect opacity; as may be seen in column 6, Table I.
[Transcription by Robin Schwartz, March 26, 2002]
jigadier brindle
02-09-2004, 12:33 AM
Pards,
A simple websearch provided a link to a historic property operated by the NPS which sells hand dipped tallow candles, their site can be found at, Gifford House (http://www.nps.gov/care/public.html_Website/store_gifford.html) . Scroll down, and you can find the hand dipped tallow, apparently with some beeswax added, and if you buy from this site the proceeds seemingly go towards a good cause.
-I'm also including a link to the "Vintage Volumes" website which is one of the few, if not the only supplier of authentic stearin candles, they can be found at: Vintage Volumes (http://www.vintagevolumes.com/candles.html)
Hope this helps,
-Nicholas Redding
Hank Trent
02-09-2004, 01:04 AM
Here's another source for stearine candles. http://www.wjgallery.com/sx010001.htm When we ordered some a while ago, we asked if they were 100% stearine and the company said yes, but it wouldn't hurt to double-check.
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
SparksBird
02-09-2004, 09:40 AM
Good luck finding spermacetti in this day and age. The whaling industry just isn't what it used to be. But, I did hear a neat story from a friend a while back that worked at Greenfield Village. She said that they actually had an old barrel of spermacetti that had been sitting around for some time and that they actually made some candles from it. However, she did say that these were not for sale and were only made for their purposes.
Lastly, I couldn't miss this opportunity to tell one of my favorite Allendale Melodian jokes: "How am McClellan's Army like de tallow candle? Dey both runs when it gits hot!!!"
Rick Musselman
Buckeye Mess
GHTI
Moonshine
02-09-2004, 11:54 AM
Nicholas,
Thanks for those links. One time I visited the Hans Herr house in Penn. and if I can recall, they may have had candles there too, much like the "Gifford House".
Jim Ross
markj
02-10-2004, 12:35 PM
Greetings,
Here's a "hardbread" box according to Trans-Mississippi Confederate specs:
[LITTLE ROCK] ARKANSAS TRUE DEMOCRAT, October 1, 1862, p. 1, c. 7
To Carpenters.
Office Chief Commissary Trans-Mississippi Department, }
Little Rock, Sept. 27, 1862. }
Sealed proposals will be received at this office, until Monday, the 5th day of October, A. D. 1862, for making Two Thousand Boxes for packing Hard Bread.
The Boxes are to be two feet long, 1 foot 6 inches wide and 1 foot 5½ inches deep, in the clear, and to be made similar to a specimen which may be seen at the office of the Post Commissary.
I will furnish lumber and part of the nails, for which the contractor will pay cost prices.
The boxes must be delivered at the rate of 5 per cent per day, of the contract, and bids will be received for five hundred boxes. Bond with approved security will be required.
John C. Palmer, Maj.
and Chief Commissary.
The specs above (24 L x 18 W x 17 1/2 D) vary significantly from those mentioned in previous posts for Federal boxes. I'm not sure why this is so, but it likely had something to do with the actual size of the hard bread itself.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
rebyank
02-12-2004, 11:40 AM
Does anyone know of any period wine, whisky or beer bottle labels? I have a good scource of period looking bottles, but I'd like to know about some labels.
sidedrummer@lycos.com
markj
02-12-2004, 12:11 PM
Hi Ian,
Today is your lucky day. If you do the following, you will see an interesting image containing a bottle label:
1. Start here: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/cwphtml/cwphome.html
2. Do a search with these key words: 114th Pennsylvania
3. Select photo #6 [Petersburg, Va. Officers of the 114th Pennsylvania Infantry playing cards in front of tents].
4. Download the high-resolution "tiff" version of this image.
5. Zoom in on the bottle immediately next to the zouave officer holding cards on the left-hand side of the table.
6. This bottle carries a label clearly marked "HADDEN'S OLD TOM COCKTAIL"
Close study of this label may provide sufficient details to make a fairly close reproduction.
Check it out!
Mark Jaeger
markj
02-12-2004, 12:27 PM
Greetings,
On a somewhat related note, this classic bartending guide was first published in 1862:
HOW TO MIX DRINKS
or
THE BON VIVANT'S COMPANION
Containing Clear and Reliable Directions for Mixing all the Beverages Used in the United States, Together with the Most Popular British, French, German, Italian, Russian and Spanish Recipes, Embracing Punches, Juleps, Cobblers, etc., etc., etc., in Endless Variety.
By JERRY THOMAS
Formerly Principal Bartender at the Metropolitan Hotel, New York, and the Planters' House, St. Louis.
TO WHICH IS APPENDED A MANUAL FOR THE MANUFACTURE
of
CORDIALS, LIQUORS, FANCY SYRUPS, ETC., ETC.,
After the Most Approved Methods Now Used in the Distillation of Liquors and Beverages, Designed for the Special Use of Manufacturers and Dealers in Wines and Spirits, Grocers, Tavern Keepers and Private Families, the Same Being Adapted to the Trade of the United States and Canada.
ILLUSTRATED WITH DESCRIPTIVE ENGRAVINGS
The Whole Containing
OVER 600 Valuable RECIPES.
By CHRISTIAN SCHULTZ,
Professor of Chemistry, Apothecary and Manufacturer of Wines, Liquors, Cordials, etc., etc,. from Berne, Switzerland.
[Published in New York by Dick & Fitzgerald, 1862]
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Bill Cross
02-12-2004, 01:02 PM
Bob Sullivan makes a good period whisky label.
Dbackfed
02-12-2004, 06:42 PM
Does anyone know a any places that make a good period bottle? :sarcastic
Jason Krausz
Prodigal Sons Mess
36th ILL "B"
PrettyBoyDonovan
02-12-2004, 06:53 PM
The Regimental Quartermaster has a new section for campaigners and I think I saw some in there. Can't really remember what style.
Does anyone know a any places that make a good period bottle? :sarcastic
Jason Krausz
Prodigal Sons Mess
36th ILL "B"
Michael Semann
02-12-2004, 07:45 PM
Does anyone know a any places that make a good period bottle?
Dog River Glassworks does some of the most exact period bottle reproductions I've seen. Check out:
http://www.dogriverglassworks.com
rebyank
02-12-2004, 11:36 PM
I cannot seem to get a hold of the large tiff pic, can anyone zoom in on it and post a zoom here? where's that guy that has been doing that with musket and apple pics? :D
2ndNHDOC
02-13-2004, 03:18 AM
\Thank You Thank You
I have been looking for period medical bottles.
Brian Schwatka
Out of the loop mess.
Michael Semann
02-13-2004, 06:09 AM
No problem Brian. I know certain items like these can be a real pain to find sometimes. Good luck.
straggler
02-15-2004, 03:54 PM
Not as clear as I would have liked but here is a close up of the bottle in question.
Next - the wall tent in the same photo has buttons in front (and it
appears on the ridge).
To attach a fly??
markj
02-15-2004, 05:19 PM
Greetings,
Yep, that's the bottle I mentioned. I suspect any concoction with the name of "Old Tom" must have been pretty potent, to say the least.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
County Militia
02-15-2004, 06:21 PM
The Sullivan Press (http://www.sullivanpress.com/Civil_war.htm) has a variety of bottle labels to purchase.
A small selection:
http://www.sullivanpress.com/images/CivilImages/dcw401.jpg
orngblsm
02-16-2004, 06:52 PM
Gents,
I'm looking for an accurate period soft bread recipe. Also was there a regulation dimension for each loaf.
Thanks
Hank Trent
02-16-2004, 11:27 PM
Here are some recipes from Beecher's Domestic Receipt Book, 1850:
http://tinyurl.com/3d6sq (it continues on the next page, followed by one for homemade yeast)
Those two are typical of the two main variations I've seen in period homemade yeast bread--either using weaker homemade yeast, making a sponge and letting it rise a long time, or brewer's yeast and adding all the flour, skipping the sponge step.
There's another one in the same book for baker's bread (http://tinyurl.com/3d6sq) which might reflect commercial bakers' practice, but I haven't researched commercial bakeries to know.
In images and recipe quantities, many loaves appear to be about the same size as typical modern bread pans. But I'm sure there were many variations, and perhaps also military contract or other specifications for commercial loaf sizes, but I can't help with that part. :(
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
GreencoatCross
02-17-2004, 12:14 AM
I've got memoir and diary documentation stating that men in the field were sometimes detailed to set up and take down the "government ovens used in the baking of our bread." Surprisingly enough this quote came from a regiment in the middle of a late summer campaign.
I've seen a myriad of photos showing soft bread ovens in action, complete with stacks of emtpy pans and bread in pans waiting to rise. I'll see if I can find them and post them for you.
Brian White
Randolph Mess
Hmm....the first part of this was practically useless. I'll get those photos.
Slouches_N_Slovens
02-17-2004, 12:26 AM
Soft bread recipe:
1. Take one piece of hardtack, place in dominant hand
2. Fill cup with water
3. Place piece of hardtack in water in cup
4. Allow hardtack to soak up water
5. Pull soggy piece of now softtack out of water
6. Enjoy "soft bread"
Repeat as needed.... ;)
hardtack1864
02-19-2004, 01:48 AM
I wanted to know if anyone has bought tin cans or any kind of reproduction items from www.victortradingco.com? If so, are they good reproductions and how do there tin cans hold up to use?
ephraim_zook
02-19-2004, 09:09 AM
Hi!
If you look carefully at the info in their website, it says "Cans are decorative only. The lids are soldered on." Whether or not they hold up to use is moot -- apparently you can't use them. Really nice looking labels, though. Too bad they are postwar.
Ron Myzie
I wanted to know if anyone has bought tin cans or any kind of reproduction items from www.victortradingco.com? If so, are they good reproductions and how do there tin cans hold up to use?
BHoover
02-19-2004, 11:52 AM
Hi!
If you look carefully at the info in their website, it says "Cans are decorative only. The lids are soldered on." Whether or not they hold up to use is moot -- apparently you can't use them. Really nice looking labels, though. Too bad they are postwar.
Ron Myzie
There is no reason you couldn't put a period label on the can, then cut the top off and use the can for a boiler.
markj
02-20-2004, 06:33 PM
Greetings,
Some weeks ago, I was asked to provide the specs stated in a Commissary contractor bid solicitation originally published in the 13 December 1862 Louisville "Daily Journal." I finally rediscovered them and they are presented below:
ARMY SUPPLIES.
OFFICE OF THE U.S. COMMISSARY OF SUBSTINENCE,
LOUISVILLE, KY., December 13, 1862.
Sealed proprosals made by first hands will be received at this office until 11 o'clock A.M. on Friday, the 19th of December, 1862 for furnishing the following substinence supplies:
***[Require] 500,000 lbs best quality Pilot Bread, packed in hickory strapped boxes containing 50 lbs net each, of fully seasoned wood, of such kinds as will impart no taste or odor to the bread, bottom and top of single pieces, or, if of two pieces, tongued and grooved together. The boxes must be 13 1/2 inches square in cross section, external measure.***
H.C. SYMONDS,
Capt. and Commissary of Substinence
The remainder of the notice also contains some interesting info on packing barrels for beans, rice, hominy, roasted (NOT green!) coffee, clarified sugar, star candles, hard soap, and molasses.
As stated in that "Military Collector & Historian" article, single piece construction of hardtack boxes was acceptable; however, two-piece construction was also perfectly fine depending on the time, place, and
contractor. The dimensions of the box stated above appear to significantly vary from those described in Kautz's book and the Army Regulations. Perhaps someone with more woodworking experience than I can determine the actual dimensions of a box "13 1/2 inches square in cross section, external measure": Maybe 27 x ? x 13 1/2?
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Sam Doolin
03-01-2004, 09:18 AM
Greetings comrades,
It is my intention to attach photos of hardtack crates/stencils. Hopefully, I will succeed at this, but often it is a coin toss. These boxes are something we have been working on and hope to offer complete with the sapling bands which would make them a unique and more accurate repro of these boxes. I would like see what interest might be generated to justify the expense of possibly having laser cut metal stencils made. Hand cutting stencils is not an enjoyable activity.
Sam Doolin
The Old Rebel Workshop
DougCooper
03-01-2004, 09:44 AM
Are these guys still around? The link we all used is bad and google only brings up the same link. Thanks in advance.
Are these guys still around? The link we all used is bad and google only brings up the same link. Thanks in advance.
Doug,
Try this company we have been using the past few years...
Bent Cracker Co.... http://www.bentscookiefactory.com/
rebyank
03-01-2004, 11:43 AM
My father has decided to become our unit QM sergeant, so we might be interested in a few of these. do you have a price list made up,
Please send me some info on your boxes.
twelfthill@lycos.com
Thanks
Company Tailor
03-01-2004, 12:16 PM
Sam,
What's your projected cost for the boxes? Retail? Wholesale? If it's in the budget I would probably get a few.
Very nice marking by the way.
Best,
Tyler
03-01-2004, 07:54 PM
I had good results from them about 8 months ago. I'll check it out and get back.
-Tyler Putman
79th N.Y.S.M.
03-01-2004, 08:04 PM
Are you talking about the Mechanical Baking Co?
Tyler
03-01-2004, 08:39 PM
Hmm. You're right, the website
www.mechanical-bakery.com
isn't working. I do have their contact info if you want to try that:
Mechanical Baking Co.
P.O. Box 513
Pekin, IL 61555
kcjust@yahoo.com
(309) 353-2414
Hope this helps. As I said before, I had good service this summer, but they may have gone out of bussiness.
-Tyler Putman
DougCooper
03-05-2004, 03:34 AM
thanks Tyler - will try them. Would not be good if they are defunk. Bents are somewhat expensive, if perhaps more edible than MBC. Will let you know.
Tyler
03-05-2004, 10:36 PM
thanks Tyler - will try them. Would not be good if they are defunk. Bents are somewhat expensive, if perhaps more edible than MBC. Will let you know.
Thanks, I'd like to know how it turns out.
-Tyler Putman
KathyBradford
03-08-2004, 01:21 PM
From a letter written by GG Uncle Absolom Kleckner, 21st OVI, Co. A December 20, 1862, Camp Hamilton, near Nashville.
"I tell you we have quite a time here catching robins. Two of our boys went out night before last and caught 35. I tell you, I made a good pot pie last night. 3 of our boys went out and caught 65. We also had another pot pie today. We bought 2 pounds of butter to season them with. We paid $1 for 2 pounds and it was strong as old cheese at that."
Looking out the window at the welcome sight of spring robins, I can't imagine thinking of them as supper. What were some other documented things the soldiers ate that wouldn't occur to us?
DougCooper
03-08-2004, 03:20 PM
...and served up by the 21st OVI.
A menu change is good, said the old soldier, and while eating an individual robin is about the same as a dove (not much there) a bunch of them could make a good dish.
Other delicacies that come to mind are possum, mule, horse, eels, turtles, gators, squirrel, snakes, woodchcucks...and anything else either fish, mammal or fowl foolish enough to stand still when soldiers are about.
It all tastes like chicken anyway... :wink_smil
DukeRPSC
03-08-2004, 04:05 PM
Gen. John B. Gordon's servant flattened and chopped up minieballs to make shot so the General could shoot birds to supplement to table fare. I'll have to pull the text to verify the birds so used. Anyway, it was something you don't think about Generals spending their time doing.
A pard of mine ( a well-credentialled historian, curator of the military collection at the AHC ) related a fad of AoT soldiers keeping small fishing kits in their pockets. Seems fish constituted a supplement to the ration when opportunity provided.
So....it wasn't all porkbelly and crackers.
Jimmayo
03-08-2004, 04:20 PM
"You would have laughed to have seen great grown men Saturday with their traps and dead falls catching birds. We were very successful, the mess I am in caught quite a number. We made a large pot pie which was very nice. "
John Kerr Beaton, 9th Va. Inf.
http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/9va/letters.html
I served in the AF with a fellow from Alabama. He was from a poor farm background and said his grandmother was rather fond of Robin pies.
Justin Runyon
03-08-2004, 04:22 PM
Captain Muller's "Eel" Breakfast
Transcribed by Larry Stevens
Excerpt from "We Were The Ninth" A History of the Ninth Regiment Ohio Volunteer Infantry by Constantine Grebner, translated and edited by Frederic Trautmann.
"On patrol in a dreadful region, we struggled up and down mountains, through ravines, and across steep slopes. You kept your balance with the aid of overhanging limbs, and you supported yourself with your rifle or sidearm, so as not to lose your footing and tumble into the depths, never to return. Certainly not a pleasurable hike. But our good humor heartened us enough to help us over the obstacles. Meanwhile the snakes simply glided along the ground and curled alluringly around trees and branches. Captain Muller soon cut off the head of one with his sword, an especially fine reptile several feet in length. Nobody noticed how he carried it or even that he brought it along.
Next morning, after the mailman delivered letters an
d packages in camp, it being a day of rest, the captain emerged from his tent, smiling contentedly. He invited several of us, who were standing around, to breakfast at 10:00. "I just got in the mail some splendid marinated eel from Cincinnati and I'm cooking it up in grand style." Three of us accepted. Our amiable benefactor hoped we might bring crackers and beverages; and we brought them. We sat down to pieces of superb eel in a tasty sauce. We crumbled and added the crackers and washed down the oily mouthfuls with an occasional pull at one of those renowned flat and square bottles. Our genial host rubbed his hands in glee and urged us to dig in. "We can't have any left over," he said. "What a shame if such good fish spoils or is thrown out."
Now, even the stomach of a soldier in the field has its limits. And so at last we were sated on those savory morsels. The bottle was empty. Captain Muller folded his hands piously across his giant paunch and turned congenially to a lieutenant notorious for being squeamish: "Well, K., old buddy, how about it? Nothing beats a well-marinated Virginia Snake!" A leap from the chair, a savage curse, a dash from the tent...and let us not say what else!"
Web Publishing Copyright © 1995 Larry Stevens
DukeRPSC
03-08-2004, 04:25 PM
I've known people who've eaten them. I am told it is dark meat. Evidently they are harvested when they flock or mob together in large numbers.
I'll stick to doves or quail, thanks, but breaded and fried, I'll bet the robins are quite good.
Member: If-it-flies,-it-dies Mess
Vuhginyuh
03-08-2004, 05:12 PM
Robin was an old favorite in Britian centuries ago.
Here is a more contemporary recipie for ''Pidgeon or Robin'', ca1820.
First cut them down the back, then take out all the bones, season them with pepper, mace, cloves, nutmeg, & salt, sew them up in their shape of a Pidgeon or Robin, pour a pint of double distilled vinegar a pint of Lisbon wine to a quart of water, put the bones in this liquor, let them boil a quarter of an hour, & season the liquor as above, then strain it from the bones, put in the Birds, boil them a quarter of an hour, then take them out, when cold put them in the liquor, cover them over with sallad oil, & tye them down close.
...and they wondered why we came to the New World.
10nycav
03-08-2004, 05:30 PM
I can tell you from personal experience that woodchuck is quite good. At least the young ones are. Better than rabbit, more like good veal. Young raccoon tastes similar, the older ones are more like mutton but still quite edible. Porcupine is good, so I've been told by friends who have sampled it, as long as it has not been dining on conifers which gives the meat a turpentine flavor. Quail and dove are two of my all time favorite meats (along with wild mallard). I'll bet most small birds are similar in flavor.
Ken Morris
10th Regt of Cavalry NYSV.
10nycav
03-08-2004, 05:34 PM
I ran across an account of some Confederate prisoners who ate--and enjoyed--cat during their confinement. It was in a little book called "Cooking for the Cause" which was for sale at the Gettysburg NP bookstore a few years back. "She must have been a notoriously fine mouser," the prisoner wrote, "she required no grease."
Ken Morris
10th Regt of Cavalry NYSV
hireddutchcutthroat
03-08-2004, 05:34 PM
Captain Muller's account is not suprising in the least. Eel is (was) a very popular dish in northern European countries and Immigrants from those countries here. ...in fact I think I know what I want to have for my Birthday dinner :wink_smil
Alamo Guard
03-08-2004, 07:10 PM
I suppose alot has to do where you were raised as far as your tastes run. Here on the Texas frontier bear was a sub for bacon as hogs were at the time not plentiful in south Texas (boy have times changed).
Possum, raccon, owl and just about anything that walked or crawled ended up in a stewpot. Every part of the animal was eaten excpet for the squeal.
When canned goods were first inroduced here on the Texas frontier they used to have a picture of a devil on the label. This was to prevent the indians from breaking into your house while your away and stealing the canned goods. However only the rich could afford canned food anyways.
Staunton Rebel
03-12-2004, 06:48 AM
I grew up in the Blue Ridge Mts. and I have seen many critters eaten. I am very fond of squirel gravy and biscuts. I have tried coon meat also, a bit too greasy for my taste but under the circumstanses of being a soldier, I bet I would have bellied up to the trough with the best of them. When we were younger, my sister and I would hunt snapping turtles and sell them to this old black woman name of Foogie. She always claimed that snappers had 13 different flavors of meat in them. She must have been in 90's back in the mid-1970s so I imagine that cooter stew was a popular dish. Bear meat was popular with the old timers on the old Brown's Gap Turnpike. Needless to say, good eatin' all aroun'.
Pvt. Waverly Adcock
5th Va. Co. E
Darrell Cochran
03-12-2004, 11:56 AM
Just the other day it occurred to me that I don't recall many - if any - mention in soldier accounts of killing deer to eat. Growing up as I did in the mountains just west of the Shenandoah Valley, I'm sure there would have been plenty of White-tails around ... Maybe it was "too common" to warrant mention?
va-yank
03-12-2004, 12:02 PM
No one has mentioned venison, and I've not seen it mentioned in any source materials, mostly soldiers hunting small game.
Some modern Dept of Fish and Game statistics on big game numbers indicate that the whitetail was just about wiped out by 1900 in most populous states. I wonder how plentiful deer would have been in Virginia and Maryland during the war years?
rebyank
03-12-2004, 12:11 PM
I have seen two things that are kind of interesting food wise.
1. I have a minnie ball that was drilled through for use as a weight on a fishing net.
2. I have seen a turtle (Giant snapping turtle) that is still alive, that was taken to a zoo. When it arrived, they noticed a small hole in the turtles shell. going in for surgery after some pretty weird x-rays, they dug out a 3 ringer minnie ball! I guess somebody tried to bring home the bacon unsucessfully. not only that, turtles are known to live for hundreds of years, so the redcoats may have even taken a few pot shots at him too :tounge_sm
I personally have never tasted snapping turtle, I kinda figure it'l get a taste of me first!
JACKSONVC
03-12-2004, 03:06 PM
Deer meat would have meant going out and hunting down a critter. Doing this away from one's unit would have gotten you into trouble. Besides, deer, more often than not, do not like being around large milling masses of humans, building fires and making lots of noise. I imagine that they scattered pretty quick when the armies showed up on thier turf. Small critters do not cause you to discharge you musket, and can generally be caught without much problem with a rudimentary trap and bait. I think the discharging of a musket without permission of one's superiors is a punishable offense under the articles of war, that in itself would rule out hunting down deer.
huntdaw
03-12-2004, 03:53 PM
Possum is pretty good actually - a bit stringy but not too bad. Young coon barbecued is very tasty. If you had one that was a bit strong it was probably an old boar. With raccoon it does make a difference in how its cooked. Haven't had snapping turtle although I have had a young one attached to the end of my finger when I was a kid. I learned my lesson there. Softshell turtle however, makes a tasty soup. They are nasty tempered though and will give you a good bite if you're not careful. Groundhog is a bit greasy but edible.
"Tastes like chicken!" mess
10nycav
03-12-2004, 05:29 PM
The best meat of any kind I ever at was green sea turtle down in Costa Rica. The locals on the northeast coast had subsistence permits to take a couple a year and one day a lady traded me some turtle stew for some cheese and canned goods. We both felt that we got the better part of the bargain. This had been smoked too. Man, if other turtles are anywhere near as good a green turtle, it's a delicacy indeed.
Cool story about the snapping turtle and the minie ball.
As for deer, yeah populations are way up over what they were a century ago, probably lots more than 150 years ago too. Today there is actually more acreage in forest in a lot of Eastern states than there was during the Civil War. And then there's all the well-watered suburban lawns to feed on . . .
Ken Morris
10th Regt of Cavalry NYSV
Staunton Rebel
03-12-2004, 07:55 PM
I think it's important to remember that folks 140 years ago weren't as particular about their protein sources. I have a great book that I refer to on a regular basis, Smokehouse Ham, Spoon Bread, & Scuppernong Wine by Joseph E. Dabney. It has many great recipes in it that date to the eighteenth century in Appalachia. I'm fond of the Ramp Pudding. :cry_smile Not that a soldier would have used all the recipes in the book, but it could be a good refernce for what mother might have made back home. And how many have ever had whistle pig pie?
Pvt. Waverly Adcock
5th Va. Co. E
KentuckyReb
03-12-2004, 10:50 PM
Here in Martin County in Indiana squirrel is considered one of the food groups. Myself I'm also quite fond of mussels. I'd never attempted to prepare them myself, just eaten them at restaurants or at someone else's house, and they were quite tasty, as is eel. But last year I traipsed down to the river and collected a few and attempted to duplicate Sam Watkins' experience, just to kill a little time. I must admit that there must be some extra step that restaurants take or something...I had the exact experience he did--rather like delicious India rubber. Buttered, salted, peppered and fried, they tasted wonderful, but just like he said, it seemed that every stroke of the jaw while chewing seemed to increase the overall mass of the stuff. I finished the lot (with some help from our dogs), but I don't think it's an experience I'll repeat any time soon. Rat I shall pass up. On the subject of cat, in which of the besieged cities do I remember reading about cats being referred to as 'roof rabbit'? By the way, with mushroom season fast approaching, this just occurred to me...is anyone else on the board familiar with and fond of 'fiddleheads'?
tomarch
03-15-2004, 12:20 AM
"You would have laughed to have seen great grown men Saturday with their traps and dead falls catching birds. We were very successful, the mess I am in caught quite a number. We made a large pot pie which was very nice. "
John Kerr Beaton, 9th Va. Inf.
http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/9va/letters.html
I served in the AF with a fellow from Alabama. He was from a poor farm background and said his grandmother was rather fond of Robin pies.
I did reforrestration work with a feller from upcountry Alabama who used to catch chipmunks and made a stew with them.
KentuckyReb
03-15-2004, 12:56 AM
I worked with a guy a couple of years ago who was missing one finger and most of another on his right hand. Lost them while 'noodling' for big catfish here along the White River. Find a big hole in the bank/rocks or a hollow log, preferably facing upstream. The really big fellers like to settle in to such a spot and just lie in there catching whatever floats downstream. (I guess there are some real monstrous flathead catfish down on the bed of the river--catfish grow as long as they eat) Anyhoo, you reach gently in palm-up and if the hole's 'occupied', you give a little tickle and the fish pops its mouth open, you grab the jaw, and voila, catfish for supper. Unfortunately, once in a while there's a turtle in there or, in this guy's case, a 60lb. alligator gar.
Clark Badgett
03-15-2004, 01:19 AM
Have eaten (where I grew up the proper term was et), possum, black snake, coon, snappin turtle, squirrle, rabbit, dog, monitor lizard, bamboo bat, snails, squid, octopus, eel, raw fish and most other common game and domesticated animals at sometime during my various world travels. Would eat most again except for the bats, they were a little too crunchy since you had to roast them without preparation of any kind. Believe it or not dog is quite tasty, and turtle is awesome.
GACornbread
03-15-2004, 06:16 PM
I grew up in rural GA. We used to go hunting all the time for the animals in the woods. Some of the favorites:
Brown Doves: The breasts are good on top of cornbread stuffing. Cook with onions and butter.
Quail: Same as the dove, baked or even fried.
Wild Pigeons and Robins were favorites althought you had to get a lot of robins.
Ducks and geese were always real prizes for dinner.
Wild Turkeys: Roast them boys.
Squirrels: We were always after these for baking, frying and soups. Great with gravy and cornbread. These were my favorites when growing up. Best in fall when they are fat.
Rabbits: They cook up really nice in a stew or with gravy in a fry pan. Make some cornbread. or with sweet potatoes. Yum Yum
Racoons: the meat is dark, the fat is strong, but you can take the gamy flavor out by marinating in vinegar or milk.
Opossums: Not good until you have freezing weather, great with sweet potatoes. For really fine eating, hold them captive for a couple of weeks feeding them cornbread, corn and acorns.
Groundhogs (or "whistle pigs") make a pie with onions, green peppers, salt and pepper.
Snapping Turtles: These make a really great soup. You catch them with a trot line. They can be quite large in some of our ponds. It's not unusual to have one at twenty plus pounds. Stew with Garlic, onions, potatoes and tomatoes and butter.
Deer: everyone eats deer and they were very popular so much so people almost wiped them out in the south in mid 19th century.
Bears: Roast bear...cook it like you do pork.
Fish: Catfish, Bass, Brim, Trout, carp and crawfish
Rattlesnakes: Fry them in batter after cutting them into 3" pieces.
Of course, a southerner would rather have a pig to roast. Wild boar is even better.
In LA, they have a receipe for just about everything with four legs or two, and anything that swims, crawls or flies.
We usually have some deer meat sauage or maybe tenderloin for breakfast at events.
"Southern fronitersmanate almost...any animal available to them. Opossum and racoon were favorites from the beginning, the 'possum taking first place,because like a fall bear he abounded in fat"
Joel Gray Taylor, "Eating, drinking and visiting in the South"
Hungry soldiers would have supplimented their diets with what they knew from back home.
GACornbread
Vuhginyuh
03-15-2004, 07:14 PM
The loction of Camp Davis '61-'64, an Infantry instruction facilty, near Masonboro Sound in Wilmington NC still displays huge piles of oyster shell. Intermingled in these camp midden piles is everyday period rubbish and large amounts of fish, terrapin, foul, pig, hog, and ox or cow bones. All of which were easily available there.
btwils
03-19-2004, 03:06 PM
If this is in the wrong area please feel free to move. Does any one make salted beef for our time periode or is there a safe recipe for it? I would like to try it, at least at one event.
Thanks Brian Wilson
JohnTaylorCW
03-19-2004, 05:27 PM
Strangely enough, some of my local supermarkets sell it, in good size tubs, as "Naval Beef." But, I'm in Toronto, Canada, and my local area has a relatively high population of Newfoundlanders, where the product is made. You might want to try an east-coast specialty store, if any exist in your area.
There was a thread with a recipe on it on the old forum, I'll check and see if I still have it.
(Edited to Add: Sorry, looks like I only have Salt Pork threads.)
John T
Texian
03-19-2004, 05:43 PM
The other Vickie Betts posted a link to some information, and after looking at a portion of it I came across this bit on the various uses of cornmeal. So, for all in need of a good Hoe Cake receipt, well here it is.
---Ed
[HOUSTON] TRI-WEEKLY TELEGRAPH, September 8, 1862, p. 1, c. 1
Corn Meal.
In reply to the offer of the Weekly Telegraph to the person who would furnish us with the greatest number of ways that corn meal can be served up as an article of food, we have received the following, and a young lady in Independence gets the "Weekly." Who will now say that we cannot dispense with flour altogether?
Corn Crisp.—Take one pint of meal, one table spoon of lard, a little salt and water—spread it on a board thin, and bake it before the fire; turn it with a string or knife.
Ash Corn Cake.—Mix up meal with water and a little salt; wrap it up in corn shucks or a collard leaf, and bake it in hot ashes.
Hoe Cake—Mix up meal and water, and bake on a hoe.
Corn Meal Ginger Cake—Take one pint of meal, three eggs, one cup of molasses, one table spoon of lard or butter, and ginger, or any other spices to suit your taste.
Johnny Cake.—Take equal quantities of sweet potatoes (boiled) and corn meal—mix with salt and lard—and bake it over or on a board before the fire.
Corn Meal Cakes.—Stir to a cream a pound and a quarter of brown sugar, a pound of butter, beat six eggs and mix them with the sugar and butter; add a tea spoonful of cinnamon or ginger; stir in a pound and three quarters of corn meal—bake in small cakes and let it remain till cold.
Corn Cakes.—One quart of milk, one tea spoon full of saleratus, two eggs and corn meal sufficient to make a batter of the consistence of pan cakes.—Bake quick—pans buttered and eat warm.
Corn Bread.—Take six pints of corn meal, one table spoonful of salt, four pints of water, mix with the hand and bake in oblong rolls two inches long—make half an hour before baking—use hot water in winter.
Light Corn Bread.—Stir four pints of meal in three pints of warm water—add one tea spoonful of salt, let it rise five or six hours, then stir it with the hand and bake it in a brick oven.
Another method is to make mush, and before it grows cold stir in a half pint of meal—let it rise and bake as the first.
Corn Cakes.—Six eggs well beaten; one pint of milk; one teaspoonful salt; two pints of mush, almost cold; two pints of meal and three tablespoonsful of melted lard; grease the oven; put one large spoonful of batter in each cake. Do not let them touch in baking.
Corn Muffins.—Made in the same way as the above. Grease the muffling hoops, and heat the oven slightly before putting in either corn cakes or muffins.
Butter or Corn Cake.—Beat the yolk of three eggs very light; add one pint of milk, two pints of mush almost cold; one teaspoonful salt; three teaspoonsful of melted butter. To be well beaten together. Before frying them, ship the whites of the eggs to a strong froth, and stir it thoroughly in the batter. For frying all kinds of batter cakes, use no more lard than is necessary to make them turn well.
Mush.—Two pints of water in a pot to boil; then take one pint of cold water and mix smoothly into a pint of meal. When the water in the pot boils, stir this well into it and let it boil for ten or fifteen minutes, or until it looks clear.
Virginia Corn Bread.—Dissolve one tablespoonful of butter in three and a half pints of boiling milk; into this scald one quart of corn meal; when cool, add a half pint of wheat flour, a little sugar, a teaspoonful of salt, and two eggs well beaten, mix well together, and bake in two cakes; tins well greased or buttered.
Brown Bread.—Mix three parts of corn meal and two parts of rye flour; sift and wet down with sweetened hot water; a little saleratus and yeast; work into a stiff pudding. Bake with a steady strong heat until well done.
Corn Bread.—To three pints of milk add as much corn meal as will make a thin batter, three eggs, two tablespoonsful of butter, a teaspoonful of saleratus, and salt to suit the taste. If not to be had, the bread is good without the eggs.
Corn Oysters.—Take three dozen ears of large young corn, six eggs, lard and butter in equal portions for frying. The corn must be young and soft. Grate it from the cob as fine as possible, and dredge it with flour. Beat very lengthy the six eggs, and mix them gradually with the corn. Then let the whole be incorporated by hard beating; add a teaspoonful of salt.
Vuhginyuh
03-19-2004, 06:04 PM
I have had most of these before. The ash cake and corn crisp are great!
Be carefull what kind of board you use for the crisp. Un-treated wood and no pine! I does work better on a board because the porous surface absorbes the small amount of liquid in the meal.
They are two easy ''field'' recipes.
Hoe cake can be cooked on anything iron, I have never had it cooked on a hoe.
In early summer when the corn is still tender the oysters (fritters) are easy to make and really good with fried fish
What is the difference in mush and grits? Around here what we call mush is made from yellow corn flour and has milk and hoop cheese in it. Polenta is very similar. Grits is dried hominy boiled in water and very popular. (Maybe I answered my own question.)
The brown bread is really great but I would not think it to be a practical compaign item.
Saleratus is baking soda(?)
BorderRuffian
03-19-2004, 06:08 PM
The other Vickie Betts posted a link to some information, and after looking at a portion of it I came across this bit on the various uses of cornmeal. So, for all in need of a good Hoe Cake receipt, well here it is.
---Ed
[HOUSTON] TRI-WEEKLY TELEGRAPH, September 8, 1862, p. 1, c. 1
Corn Meal.
In reply to the offer of the Weekly Telegraph to the person who would furnish us with the greatest number of ways that corn meal can be served up as an article of food, we have received the following, and a young lady in Independence gets the "Weekly." Who will now say that we cannot dispense with flour altogether?
Corn Crisp.—Take one pint of meal, one table spoon of lard, a little salt and water—spread it on a board thin, and bake it before the fire; turn it with a string or knife.
Ash Corn Cake.—Mix up meal with water and a little salt; wrap it up in corn shucks or a collard leaf, and bake it in hot ashes.
Hoe Cake—Mix up meal and water, and bake on a hoe.
Corn Meal Ginger Cake—Take one pint of meal, three eggs, one cup of molasses, one table spoon of lard or butter, and ginger, or any other spices to suit your taste.
Johnny Cake.—Take equal quantities of sweet potatoes (boiled) and corn meal—mix with salt and lard—and bake it over or on a board before the fire.
Corn Meal Cakes.—Stir to a cream a pound and a quarter of brown sugar, a pound of butter, beat six eggs and mix them with the sugar and butter; add a tea spoonful of cinnamon or ginger; stir in a pound and three quarters of corn meal—bake in small cakes and let it remain till cold.
Corn Cakes.—One quart of milk, one tea spoon full of saleratus, two eggs and corn meal sufficient to make a batter of the consistence of pan cakes.—Bake quick—pans buttered and eat warm.
Corn Bread.—Take six pints of corn meal, one table spoonful of salt, four pints of water, mix with the hand and bake in oblong rolls two inches long—make half an hour before baking—use hot water in winter.
Light Corn Bread.—Stir four pints of meal in three pints of warm water—add one tea spoonful of salt, let it rise five or six hours, then stir it with the hand and bake it in a brick oven.
Another method is to make mush, and before it grows cold stir in a half pint of meal—let it rise and bake as the first.
Corn Cakes.—Six eggs well beaten; one pint of milk; one teaspoonful salt; two pints of mush, almost cold; two pints of meal and three tablespoonsful of melted lard; grease the oven; put one large spoonful of batter in each cake. Do not let them touch in baking.
Corn Muffins.—Made in the same way as the above. Grease the muffling hoops, and heat the oven slightly before putting in either corn cakes or muffins.
Butter or Corn Cake.—Beat the yolk of three eggs very light; add one pint of milk, two pints of mush almost cold; one teaspoonful salt; three teaspoonsful of melted butter. To be well beaten together. Before frying them, ship the whites of the eggs to a strong froth, and stir it thoroughly in the batter. For frying all kinds of batter cakes, use no more lard than is necessary to make them turn well.
Mush.—Two pints of water in a pot to boil; then take one pint of cold water and mix smoothly into a pint of meal. When the water in the pot boils, stir this well into it and let it boil for ten or fifteen minutes, or until it looks clear.
Virginia Corn Bread.—Dissolve one tablespoonful of butter in three and a half pints of boiling milk; into this scald one quart of corn meal; when cool, add a half pint of wheat flour, a little sugar, a teaspoonful of salt, and two eggs well beaten, mix well together, and bake in two cakes; tins well greased or buttered.
Brown Bread.—Mix three parts of corn meal and two parts of rye flour; sift and wet down with sweetened hot water; a little saleratus and yeast; work into a stiff pudding. Bake with a steady strong heat until well done.
Corn Bread.—To three pints of milk add as much corn meal as will make a thin batter, three eggs, two tablespoonsful of butter, a teaspoonful of saleratus, and salt to suit the taste. If not to be had, the bread is good without the eggs.
Corn Oysters.—Take three dozen ears of large young corn, six eggs, lard and butter in equal portions for frying. The corn must be young and soft. Grate it from the cob as fine as possible, and dredge it with flour. Beat very lengthy the six eggs, and mix them gradually with the corn. Then let the whole be incorporated by hard beating; add a teaspoonful of salt.
I have heard the term "corn dodgers",was wondering if those are a variation of one of the above,and if they are PEC?If so,would like a recipe to try them as well.
Thanks,
Forrest Peterson
Vuhginyuh
03-19-2004, 06:31 PM
Corned beef is the same thing here in SE North Carolina. Pickled or corned meats are fresh cuts cured in a brine. It is faster to do than smoking or salt-dry curing but it will spoil if removed from the brine and not prepared soon.
There are actual pickled meats and shellfish that are preserved in spices, vinegar or cider and I have seen on occasions a port/dark beer mixture. Eater beware.
I have seen these listed on a sutler's sign in an image taken near Richmond.
Some people will soak pickled meats overnight before cooking, but I do know those who will boil it after a quick rince and thats it.
Johan Steele
03-19-2004, 08:28 PM
Hormel sells both Salt Pork & Salt Beef, guaranteed to be in stock at any supermarket near a large Russian immigrant community... at least that's what I was told by a Hormel salesman about a year ago whan I asked him why I could find it at some places but not others. The Salt Pork is actually pretty decent, I've never tried the Salted Beef though.
RJSamp
03-22-2004, 02:10 AM
For those coarse Hominy Grit fans out there, there's always samp porridge. A staple of colonial American life, there are numerous diary references to this simple dish during the ACW. Basically coarse ground dried white corn, salt pork, and any fresh vegetables you can scrounge up. stew for a day...eat when you're hungry, add more ingredients when available.....keep the pot on the fire and eat hardy all weekend.
RJ Samp (and I know what a samp pounder is....)
Texian
03-22-2004, 01:22 PM
Just curious...if campainging and eating out of my haversack, how do I let something "stew for a day" while keeping "the pot on the fire" and then "eat hardy all weekend" ? :wink_smil
---Ed
flattop32355
03-22-2004, 08:38 PM
Just curious...if campainging and eating out of my haversack, how do I let something "stew for a day" while keeping "the pot on the fire" and then "eat hardy all weekend" ? :wink_smil
---Ed
It is a practice that only the most authentic hardcores have mastered. :wink_smil
Charles Heath
03-22-2004, 08:59 PM
Vuhj,
"Saleratus is baking soda."
It can be used in much the same manner as baking soda, and it does not leave the scant bitter taste.
This link may prove of some use to further refine or refute the above assumption. By the time the various leavens wind down to Saleratus near the bottom of the page, the answer will be clear. Some stores still carry it amongst the offerings in the spice rack filler aisle.
http://www.foodsubs.com/Leaven.html
This is a wonderful website beyond this one page for other subsistence related definitions.
Charles Heath
RJSamp
03-22-2004, 10:56 PM
Use your god given talents for initiative and creativity instead of burying your brain in your haversack? :tounge_sm
If on campaign, you could always steal the food from the local inhabitants. Jackson's Corps dined well after Bristoe Junction was captured with it's vast wares...... wonder where the boys got their pies and fresh baked bread from during the Antietam campaign? How about those Cherries in Pennsylvania in late June? I would have liked to have been the Wisconsin boy who had his canteen filled up with milk punch (for the unitiated that's a brandy milk and lemon juice drink that was often used for wounded soldier's....delicious).
Morgan's Raid the CSA troopers routinely came up to houses in the evening and requested a meal be prepared for 60, 80 troopers. Then they swapped their worn out mounts for the farmer's fresh horses....and ate like kings. On campaign. Living out of their haversacks.
Soups, stews, and 12 hour baked army beans on the march usually require cooking at night or in the evening. The 83rd Pennsylvania used their 3 pint muckets to good effect during the Penninsula Campaign. chicken boiled in Chesapeake Bay salt water during the Yorktown siege was deemed delicious. Caspar Trepp of Berdan's Sharpshooter's noted that the German's and Swiss who tended to make their ration issue into delicious soups and stews reported to sick call less often than the English and New Yorkers who tended to fry their food.
I have read where haversacks were used to carry warm stew......yummy. Actually a mucket with a cloth or leather tied down lid is a good stew carrier.
Blackford's 5th Alabama Battalion (Rodes Division) on the march to Gettysburg came upon a farm yard with a flock of chickens in it. The bugle calls HALT and DISPERSE were sounded. two minutes later ATTENTION and FORWARD were sounded. No chickens left in the farm yard. That night they cooked chicken soup while on campaign and living out of their haversacks....maybe you can do the same? Here's the receipt for chicken soup:
60 fresh killed, plucked, cleaned, and cut up chickens
a 'garden' of green onions and potatoes
'borrowed' metal vessels
simmer for 2 hours
serves 150 troops
time to move past the hard tack and slab bacon ration issue living out of the haversack routine and live as they did?
samp porridge can be cooked in less than an hour on a split rail fence fire......you don't 'have' to cook it all day long. Add the vegetables that you foraged while on the march.
Your mileage and creative cooking skills will vary. Some of us eat off of a plate or canteen half instead of out of our haversacks..... :wink_smil
RJ Samp
Hank Trent
03-23-2004, 12:53 AM
If on campaign, you could always steal the food from the local inhabitants. (snip)
Not sure at what point the tongue was removed from the cheek, so I'm not sure if the suggestions were meant to be actually applied at reenactments or not. :)
I just came from an event last weekend where a squad of Union soldiers who were out of rations did indeed stop at a house, order the inhabitants to slaughter and cook them the small pig that was in the pen nearby, and a few chickens wound up being killed and eaten as well. I didn't see it happen first hand, as I was staying with another family who'd packed their things on a horse and an ox and were temporarily hiding out in a cave a quarter mile away. If the soldiers wanted vegetables or fresh eggs or jam, they could steal or purchase them (with period money) from local citizens also. Alas, the cow didn't freshen in time, or there would have been fresh milk for the taking too.
So yes, the kind of food mentioned in those accounts is certainly possible at events.
But the logistics are great, and the choice of what's going to be available for forage during the event is generally not within the control of the average event attendee.
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
Rufus
03-23-2004, 01:47 PM
Can anyone point me in the right direction for information on making essence of coffee? I have looked in a number of places and cant seem to find any directions for it.
K Bartsch
03-23-2004, 01:57 PM
Hi,
This is one of those things that comes up about every 6 months or so.
Try this:
http://www.fugawee.com/coffee.htm
The gentleman's shoes and boots have been soundly pillaried as inauthentically made , but no one yet has posted anything negative about his his essence of coffee.
Cordially,
markj
03-23-2004, 02:01 PM
Greetings,
I know this has been discussed before elsewhere on this forum but the way I make essence of coffee is as follows:
1/2 cup concentrated coffee crystals (e.g., "Folger's")
Add individual drops of water into the crystals and stir until have have a heavy, thick brown paste.
Add a can of concentrated milk ("Borden's" is good) and mix. If you see chunks in the mix, just put the bowl (assuming it's microwave-safe) in a microwave and heat for a bit then stir again or put the mix in a sauce pan over low heat and stir until you get a thick, gooey, dark brown conglomeration. Once the mix cools you can literally stand up your spoon in it. A little experimentation should make come out just right.
Many folks put their essence of coffee into small tins (i.e., musket cap tins) although this stuff was originally put into one or two pound cans. Warning: "essence" is VERY strong and a little goes a long way--a spoonful to a tin cup of hot water is usually plenty. I once made the mistake of using too much and it about "blew me a new one"--I was flying for the rest of the day. ;)
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Rufus
03-23-2004, 02:17 PM
Thnaks for the info guys this helps a lot.
hireddutchcutthroat
03-23-2004, 07:17 PM
I have never seen this before, I have never tried it, but I just found this while looking for something else.
http://www.frenchmarketcoffee.com/concentrate.html
Thoughts?
PigPen
03-23-2004, 10:26 PM
If you look in antique stores and at some relic sites you can find original bottles with Essence on one side and London on the other. From what I have read and seen these were fairly common from the 1860's through the 1880's.
K Bartsch
03-23-2004, 11:10 PM
Finally,
This stuff is already mixed up and ready to pour into hot water. Careful, its stout stuff from Scotland where the men are men and the women are too! :baring_te
(turned on to the stuff by Scots relatives.)
http://www.sybertooth.com/camp/
Slainte'
PERSICH
03-24-2004, 12:11 AM
Reading through my copy of hardtack and coffee the writer makes reference to being served beans or given beans to cook as part of his rations. My question is what kind of bean would have been served he does make a reference to baked beans which I think i can safely assume is not like baked beans we know today.Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shane Persich
Cold Steel Mess
markmason
03-24-2004, 12:28 AM
I can refer you to this sub-forum Editorial Article titled: Army Bean by Rick Mussleman. He references several Heirloom beans that may have been commonly found in your bean issue.
Alamo Guard
03-24-2004, 06:39 AM
Our unit this past weekend used white beans and baked them. We had a scenerio for being "In Camp". Thanks to a piece of burlap, a dutch oven, and a good bed of coals, our clay oven turned our little white beans into a tasty breakfast.
RedCordCO
03-24-2004, 09:54 AM
Reading through my copy of hardtack and coffee the writer makes reference to being served beans or given beans to cook as part of his rations. My question is what kind of bean would have been served he does make a reference to baked beans which I think i can safely assume is not like baked beans we know today.Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shane Persich
Cold Steel Mess
I'd opt for what is known now as a navy bean if you live EAST of the Mississippi. If you live WEST of the Mississippi there is more documentation of pinto beans having been used. Pintos become very much more prominent the further west you go. Navy beans would've been the import out here and stocks from the East of navy beans would have only come overland with settlers and some traders. More Anglo-centric folks would've used them because that was what they were used to, initially. Pintos were cheaper to trade for, easier to grow in a high and dry climate and less of a hassle to get than the Navy beans from back East. Add too the large Hispanic population that took over the cultivation of certain historic bean types [mainly pintos] from the Indians and there is quite a precedent for this particular bean's use here out West. I doubt the Army seriously quibbled about the exact TYPE of bean given to their soldiers the further in the war you got and the farther from normal supply stocks you got. It would also be less of a headache to deal with local, comparable product than have to constantly ASK Washington or St. Louis to provide what should be readily obtainable locally the further in the War that you got.
Of course, if you live East of the Big River, just ignore my Western ramblings. Just an overview but it likely won't mean 'beans' to you. [heh heh!]
JMHO,
Rob Burchardt
PS- Yes, the baked beans of today are NOT like those of the CW period. Take one look at a period recipe and you'll see how!
Moonshine
03-24-2004, 12:06 PM
Hey guys,
Thanks for posting those above links! I've been looking for sources of chicory lately and it seems there's none to be had in Calif. - southern Calif. that is!!!
Jim Ross
hireddutchcutthroat
03-24-2004, 01:58 PM
Hey guys,
Thanks for posting those above links! I've been looking for sources of chicory lately and it seems there's none to be had in Calif. - southern Calif. that is!!!
Jim Ross
Jim
Click on the link I posted above. I get that brand of chickory coffee at Safeway.
GeraldTodd
03-24-2004, 02:42 PM
That's no good, it says "Refrigerate after opening."
K Bartsch
03-24-2004, 04:22 PM
You sure don't have to refrigerate the "Camp" coffee. No bacterium could possibly survive more than a second or two in that thick, black, highly caffeinated goo. :wink_smil
Skeet
03-24-2004, 05:15 PM
Pards, We just had a winter encampment and one of the guys from the 3rd Ark made some of this stuff. He had a period label and was issued to us as rations. Now, one warning is to be careful how much you put in your cup. It is very potent! Cpl Dan Morgan, 10th Va (IVR)
SparksBird
03-25-2004, 09:43 AM
Shane,
I have actually researched this quite a bit and really answer your question, it is pretty darn hard to figure out exactly what type of bean was actually issued by the army. In my article, I do make mention of what type of beans were commonly found back then. For authenticity sake, I would recommend a plain old white bean. There is a huge amount of period varieties that are simply white. So, a common white bean of some sort can pass for looks as an heirloom. As far as cooking it goes, they would have simply boiled it with some salt pork, or in some cases(when in a set camp) prepared baked beans. I actually tried this once and it took a while. You actually dig a hole and build a good fire in it. After it has died down and you have some really nice coals, you put the beans with some salt pork added, into the hole, in a dutch oven. You then cover it with coals and replace the sod. Thus, you have a little buried oven going. It usually take a little while for it to bake though, but it is worth the wait. For period bean varieties, check out our article on the buckeye mess website: www.buckeyemess.homestead.com
Rick Musselman
Buckeye Mess
GHTI
Justin Runyon
03-25-2004, 12:40 PM
I did find a reference to Baked Beans, I think its in Fremantles Book. Illl see if I can find it.
Hank Trent
03-25-2004, 12:59 PM
There was a long discussion on army beans and baked beans here:
http://www.cwreenactors.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=1443&forum=Howto
Especially check out the sub-section around "Some thoughts and questions about beans..." and the posts by "Eleventh Maine." Also my post on that thread titled "The Army Bean" discussed varieties of white beans, specifically.
Hank Trent
hanktrent@voyager.net
cadetbentley
03-25-2004, 02:28 PM
Can anyone point me in the right direction for information on making essence of coffee? I have looked in a number of places and cant seem to find any directions for it.
essence of coffee is a very quick way to make coffee. when i made it, i ordered a esscence of coffee can from www.jarnaginco.com and then i went to walmart and bought a can of folgers instant coffee and a small water spray bottle. i then put the coffee in the can then i sprayed the coffee with water until it turned into the consistancy of elmers glue. after you have made the esscence of coffee, dont just close the can, put a piece of parchement paper or cloth on top of it and then put the cap on and push down hard. you will still have some leaking, but not alot.
cadet bentley
Tenthtexas
03-26-2004, 02:04 AM
If you have never had this stuff, know that one table spoon will make a good stout gallon of coffee. Even if you like your coffee strong, this will do it. One can of essence will easily satisfy 100 men.
Art Milbert
Darrell Cochran
03-26-2004, 10:11 AM
If you have never had this stuff, know that one table spoon will make a good stout gallon of coffee. Even if you like your coffee strong, this will do it. One can of essence will easily satisfy 100 men.
But how common was this stuff? References to coffee beans being issued are common in soldier accounts, but I don't recall seeing a lot of talk about using essence of coffee ... And if it came in one-pound tins and one can makes enough for 100 men, how many individuals would have bothered with the weight/volume?
Just food (and drink) for thought
AZReenactor
03-26-2004, 03:08 PM
I was looking through old threads and this particular pan caught my eye. I can't tell from the photo but is there any information on how the handle was attached on this frying pan? It looks very similiar to one I recently say at an antique store that had what looked like a welded handle.
FWIW, here's a photo of a frying pan that was carried by a Federal soldier. Once part of a GAR exhibit in Trumansburg, NY, the tag says: "Frying Pan Knife Fork & Spoon that went from Atlanta to the Sea." It was the property of Henry Rudie of the 137th NY. It is 7-1/2 inches in diameter, and weighs only 13 ounces.
John Tobey
ephraim_zook
03-26-2004, 05:09 PM
Geez. I must REALLY like strong coffee. One hefty tablespoon of essence made from the recipe posted elsewhere on this thread yields one really good tin cup of coffee for me. I can't possibly see how a tablespoon would make anything but the most insipid, tea-like flavour in a gallon of water. Nevertheless, among the information posted on the Jarnigan site there is a statement that 1 gallon of essence (the concentrate, of course) will serve 100 men.
If you have never had this stuff, know that one table spoon will make a good stout gallon of coffee. Even if you like your coffee strong, this will do it. One can of essence will easily satisfy 100 men.
Art Milbert
Stateline
03-26-2004, 05:47 PM
My brother, Harvey Eason, who lives near Macon Ga. makes some good accurate frying pans with the correctly riveted handles with the little pigtails up on the end of the handle. I will see him tommorow & check to see if he has any already made. I own 4 of them in various sizes & I believe everyone in our unit probably has one.
George Eason/1st Ga. State Line
hardtack61
03-27-2004, 11:36 AM
Hi
I just was wondering how to keep slab bacon safe to eat when you go and get to reenactment. ive been trying to figure out this one for a while. how do you guys do this?
JimKindred
03-27-2004, 11:45 AM
If you buy smoke and sugar cured bacon done the traditional way you do not have to worry about keeping it cool at an event, just make sure you wrap it to keep the flies away.
What makes you sick is the store bought slab bacon from the cooler of the meat department.
Contact me privately and I will give you a source for this type bacon that can be mail ordered.
Justin Runyon
03-27-2004, 11:50 AM
Jim is right, If the bacon is properly cured there is no need to worry about it, its hould keep well past the three days your at an event. There is a great source for correct bacon, hams and sausages in Indianapolis if anyone would like contact info.
Amtmann
03-27-2004, 12:13 PM
http://www.scotthams.com/price.html
BACON - #55 Slab 9 -13 lb. (per lb.) 2.60
If you don't need 9-13 lbs, tell them you're a reenactor and sometimes they'll sell you less.
Hi
I just was wondering how to keep slab bacon safe to eat when you go and get to reenactment. ive been trying to figure out this one for a while. how do you guys do this?
BrianHicks
03-27-2004, 12:55 PM
If you but a large slab. Hang it in a dry cool space (preferrably out of direct sunlight) and it will keep for a year or two. Cut of what ever portion you want to take to an event, wrap it in some paper or cloth, (just to reduce getting the grease from it on other things in your haversack or knapsack) tie it up, stuff it in your haversack, and it'll keep until you use it.
Usually, on the first morning, I'll cut all of my slab bacon (or big piece of salt pork... depending on what I've got for that event) into thinner slices and cook all of the meat at once. I'll then re-wrap what I don't eat at that sitting. Later in the day if I get hungery, I already have some cooked meat to chew on. When I want to eat a hot meal, I jsut re-heat what I had already cooked (besides.... sometimes you find you don't have time to cook... and eating raw pork, as we all know, is a big negative.)
Kevin O'Beirne
03-27-2004, 01:19 PM
This question has been asked so many times over the years. If you have a phobia about uncooked bacon and want to be "more authentic like the real soldiers", then cook your slab bacon either as soon as you arrive at the event, or before you arrive. Remember, soldiers usually went on campaign with "three days' cooked rations".
From "The Columbia Rifles Research Compendium" article on rations:
**************************
Wilbur Hinman wrote, “If bread was the ‘staff of life’, then meat was life itself.” The most common meat ration issued to Federal soldiers on campaign was either salt pork or fresh beef. Many firsthand accounts report that issuance of ham was rare in the extreme.
Similar to the ills that plagued hardtack, the meat ration issued to Union soldiers was often of less-than-desirable quality, and meat infested with maggots and weevils was not uncommon. Also, fate played a big part in the quality and type of cut issued to the men, as explained by a soldier from Massachusetts:
“In drawing his ration of meat from the commissary the quartermaster had to be governed by his last selection. If it was a [meaty] hindquarter then he must take a [boney] forequarter the next time… The kind of piece drawn naturally determined its disposition in the soldier’s cuisine. If it was a stringy, flabby piece, straightaway it was doomed to a dish of lobscouse… If the meat was pretty solid…it was quite likely to be served as beefsteak.”
How was meat carried? The answer is easy and simple: it was simply thrown into the haversack, without cover, wrapper, or bag. Soldier accounts often refer to the haversack as a very nasty, smelly, greasy environ, made all the moreso by raw meat constantly rubbing up against the haversack’s other contents.
Fresh beef was often issued on the march, and the Union Army drove with its wagon trains herds of beeves that numbered into the thousands. On the march to Fredericksburg in November, 1862, a private recalled that his brigade was, “detailed as a guard for a drove of 700 head of cattle accompanying the army… The beasts had recently arrived from the mountains of Texas.”
A soldier in the Army of the Potomac recalled how fresh beef was usually issued and prepared:
“Our beef, when we got any, marched with us and was in the best of condition, no fat, all bone and muscle. It was usually killed about 4:00 a.m. and we got it in time for breakfast. We were supposed to get 3/4 of a lb. No choice cuts, take it as we got it, bone and muscle counted, we stuck it on a sharp pointed stick, held it to the fire, and roasted it with our coffee and hard tack.”
Because of its tendency to spoil quickly, one sees little in the way of fresh beef rations in the ranks of reenactors. Living history units that opt to provide the occasional fresh beef ration to their members should issue it very early in the morning. To minimize health risks, reenactors should consider providing only one day’s ration of fresh beef per man, which should be cooked immediately upon its issuance. “Good” cuts of beef should be avoided—the average Federal soldier did not feast on sirloin and filet mignon on the march. Instead, go for the cheapest cut of beef available at the butcher shop; issuing a skinny rib or soup-shank is ideal and historically accurate.
Commonly known as “sow belly” by both Federals and Confederates, salt pork was perhaps the most common form of meat issued to the men in blue. Salt pork was shipped to the army in barrels, which were full of meat packed in salty lard. One soldier likened the noise made by salt pork being pulled from its lard packing as akin to the sound of a boot being pulled from Virginia mud. As seen in many period photographs, sometimes the salt would leach out of the barrels and create white streaks on the outside of the barrel.
Reenactors should avoid modern “salt pork” sold in supermarkets because it is very fatty and quite different from the salt pork issued during the Civil War. Accurate salt pork does not seem to be available today, and therefore “the closest substitute” is often resorted to by reenactors.
Reenactors in the Southern states have a leg up on folks who live in the North, because of the greater appreciation for the meat of the swine in Dixie, even today. Southerners have available to them a great variety of pork products, such as corned hams, smoked pork, and other types of meat that are unavailable or very rare in the North.
Perhaps the closest that modern “Yankees” can get to period salt pork is slab bacon. Slab bacon is both smoked and lightly salted—it is not as salty as original salt pork—and will “keep” in a haversack for a three-day event, as long as common sense is employed (i.e., do not leave your black haversack loaded with slab bacon lying in the July sun all day). Slab bacon can be obtained in many supermarkets or butcher shops, usually with a one- or two-day advance order. Slab bacon can be purchased at a fairly reasonable price, although some comparison shopping is a good idea, because prices can range from less than two dollars to as much as four dollars a pound. Most butcher shops can provide the bacon as a “slab”, with or without the rind (skin), or cut up in to individual rations of three-quarters of a pound each. Most slab bacon is fairly lean and makes truly first-rate eating at a living history event.
Like the original soldiers, reenactors can cook their slab bacon in a variety of ways. When in garrison and rations were prepared by the company cook it was, according to a man in the Army of the Potomac, “fated to be boiled twenty-four times out of twenty five”.
When prepared on the march by the private soldier, sow belly was typically roasted over the fire at the end of a stick, ramrod, or bayonet, or fried, usually on a tin plate or canteen half held at the end of a split stick. Billings maintained, “broiling was, I think, the favorite style with the oldest campaigners.” Salt pork was also used as an ingredient in lobscouse and was often boiled as soup. Often the soldiers simply ate their sow belly raw, sometimes sandwiched between hardtack. Eating it raw took less effort than cooking; a teenaged private serving under Grant in 1864 recalled, “Our pork we did not cook, it would be wasting the fat.” Regardless of how authentic it may be, reenactors should not eat their pork raw due to well-known health considerations, such as trichinosis.
*****************************
I hope this helps. It's a shame the AC Forum v.2.0 database is still unavailable, because this question has been asked and answered dozens of times.
Rufus
03-27-2004, 01:50 PM
As long as you can keep it wraped in something to keep flies off and it is in a large piece it will keep for a few days. I have had it still be good for 3 days in 90-95 degree weather.
24thGAIrishman
03-27-2004, 06:45 PM
I was at the same living history event as Skeet, and i will agree that the essence of coffee was strong. I was also wondering if it was correct for alot of soldiers to have it because it is alot easier then taking beans and smashing 'em with the butt of my musket.
Thanks,
Cprl. Rich Johnson
24th GA
McMillian Guards
billwatson
03-28-2004, 10:52 AM
I think folks get sick more often from contaminating their food during preparation in the field than they do from the food "going bad." In addition to normal hygiene often getting set aside in field conditions, we are also in an environment contaminated by fecal coliform. Even if you do not use the sinks yourself, if you have walked through a field used by cattle or cavalry you have contaminated your shoes with fecal coliform. Stop once to tie your shoe and it's on your hands. Proceed to handle food and you've set the stage for a stomach upset.
Food not cooked long enough would be my best second bet for sources of stomach upset. If you cook it until it's done, the heat should kill any bacteria. It's why I nag people to cook during daylight if at all possible -- just about impossible to tell if meat or bacon is properly cooked when it's dark, firelight doesn't give us a very good read. But, again, I think the contamination comes from food handling, not from spoilage of the food due to lack of refrigeration.
I'd also suggest that you eat a little bit of what you're taking into the field in the week leading up to the event. If you simply don't eat bacon in the real world, this heavily salted, cured stuff can be quite a shock to your digestive system. Add that atop all the other stresses we subject ourselves to at some events -- outdoors in brisk or adverse weather, a hard ground for sleep, a new schedule for sleep, odd noises, strangers to meet and adjust to, and add a little anxiety about trying to fit in to the activity to help make the thing come off -- and it's not hard to see why a body might say "enough, already, bacon begone."
Amtmann
03-28-2004, 11:06 AM
I have to agree with Bill. People not cooking meat long enough is probably main reason for sickness. Simply put, most reenactors do not know the basics of cooking and telling when something is done. I don't trust the cooking of others in the field, so I do all my cooking myself. ;)
MontReb
03-28-2004, 08:13 PM
Believe it or not, "Upper Mississippi Valley Mercantile" offers a fair pan with a hand forged handle- it was listed favorably in the "Watchdog" a couple of years ago.
BlindSword
03-29-2004, 03:03 AM
I am having trouble finding research through the internet on constructing period style ammo/bread boxes, field desks, stools, tables, etc. I am wondering if anyone here knows of any site on the web that offers enough research and instructions on constructing these items. I have already built one ammo box successfully but I would like to extend my inventory.
Kevin, you must sign your name to all posts on this forum. Please review the rules of posting. Also, please do a search of the forum to see if this has come up. I know there have been discussions on ammo boxes before - Mike Chapman
ElizabethClark
03-29-2004, 11:36 AM
I would suggest skipping the internet, and heading right for a library; even our small county library has an extensive "history of woodworking" section, with at least half a dozen books on period furniture, traditional cabinetry, military furniture, etc--both with traditional hand-tool information, and how to do traditional techniques with modern tools.
While the internet is great--the library is still tops for a lot of things!
markj
03-29-2004, 12:10 PM
Hi,
I would suggest you check elsewhere in these forums. For example, I recently provided the "specs" for a Cincinnati QM Depot hardtack box, as well as specs for a Confederate Trans-Mississippi hardtack box, that I found in 1862 newspapers. These vary somewhat from what is described in the U.S. Army Regulations (the C.S. Regs do not list specific dimensions for hardtack boxes).
You would also be well served to look through "Military Collector & Historian" magazine. The latest issue includes an article by Fred Gaede providing a detailed description of a government-contract field desk.
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
markj
03-29-2004, 12:22 PM
Hi,
Also, don't underestimate the value of contemporary photographs. The attached image is extracted from the following Library of Congress photo:
[Petersburg, Va. Dead Confederate soldier, in trench beyond a section of chevaux-de-frise]. (Photographed 3 April 1865)
Regards,
Mark Jaeger
Michael Semann
03-29-2004, 01:11 PM
Yet another source you might check in regards to measured dimensions of extant boxes of various kinds (including ammo crates) and camp desks, chairs etc. is Dr. Francis Lord 's CIVIL WAR COLLECTOR'S ENCYCLOPEDIA Vol I, II, III, Book Sales, 1995
. Although the black and white photos of the listed items are a bit blurry, and reluctant to give up much detail, the verbal description (including complete measurements) is often of help.
BlindSword
03-29-2004, 02:00 PM
I think I will take a visit to both the library and the book store and conduct a more in-depth research. Thank you for all of your replies, they have been quite helpfull.
Clark Badgett
03-29-2004, 07:42 PM
I know this is going to draw some serious flak, but why not look for a small era cast iron skillet or griddle. They did exist, and believe it or not they are usually a tab bit lighter that the sheet iron variety. Now I am certainly not advocating going to the modern large box stores and buying the modern Lodge offerings (except to use at home, for which they work very well I might add) but true pre 1890s bottom poured small cookware that is small enough to fit in a haversack. And I might add they are very plentiful and usually cheap. I will see if I can dig up more info on the 1860s and earlier variety, to use as a reference.
FilthyFed64
03-29-2004, 09:04 PM
Does anyone know what a period can opener looks like? If so, are there any reproductions out there?
hireddutchcutthroat
03-29-2004, 09:06 PM
If you are portraying a soldier on campaign, it would look like your bayonet or pocket knife. There were can openers during the period, but I am not aware of a wide spread usage of any one example. I have my doubts of a soldier carrying one of these heavy dangerous contraptions
Clark Badgett
03-29-2004, 10:38 PM
I have a rough drawing that Rick Bailey found years ago of one type. What the size it was I have no clue or how you would use the odd looking contraption. So would I be willing to mail anyone a copy? Not unless an original like it popped up and I knew the dimentions. Sorry.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.