RichmondDepot show.on.folder
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    10

    Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    Comrades,

    I remember reading from Men at Arms Series that many Confederate soldiers didn't carry a bayonet because they had thrown them away on long marches or because they werent issued at all. Any opinions on this?

    Would an impression of an ANV soldier without a bayonet be farby?

    Yours,
    Eric Seppala

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Ringgold Ga
    Posts
    10

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    Quote Originally Posted by ES1861
    Comrades,

    I remember reading from Men at Arms Series that many Confederate soldiers didn't carry a bayonet because they had thrown them away on long marches or because they werent issued at all. Any opinions on this?

    Would an impression of an ANV soldier without a bayonet be farby?

    Yours,
    Eric Seppala
    Im not sure about the ANV but the Chickamauga NMP guidlines suggest that only 1/3 of the troops should carry bayonets. They were almost worthless items that you would have to lug all over creation. I would have thrown mine away too, but if you show up at an event without one they look at you like you have commitet a cardinal sin. That needs to change, especailly for late war events.

    Troy Alton
    Smythers Mess
    19th Tennessee
    YHR
    WIG

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Lancaster , PA
    Posts
    186

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    If supply shortages caused the problem. That is one thing. If a soldier was never issued a bayonet it would be understandable to not have one. The government made every effort to ensure it's soldiers were issued certain items. Once those items were issued .To lose those items made the offending soldier answerable to his NCO's and Officers. While, a bayonet may not seem worthwhile to a 21st century reenactor, it was worthwhile to a 19th century Soldier. Maybe it wasn't a popular item of issue . It was a part of his weapons system. To be a generic ACW G.I grunt carrying a bayonet is paramount . If a particular impression is being attempted and it is proven through reasearch that said regiment had no bayonets or a shortage thereof then may all means do so.
    BTW, the MAA series by Osprey isn't reliable as a research vehicle.
    Barry Dussel
    FTM/EBGH

    In memory: Wm. Stanley, 6th PA Cav. Ernst C. Braun, 9th PA. Cav. John E. Brown & Edwin C. Brown, 23rd PVI

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cape Fear
    Posts
    1,412

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    Why just late war Confederates? What about the status of the issued equipment of Sherman's boys (after Bentonville) when they marched down Walnut Street into camp at Goldsboro NC?
    B. Garrison Beall

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    1,536

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    Some arguments for having a bayonet;

    Digging tool

    Cooking tool

    Not to mention stacking arms.

    In the realm of things to drop along the way, I probably would have held onto the bayonet
    Mike "Dusty" Chapman

    Member: CWT, CVBT, NTHP, MOC, KBA, Stonewall Jackson House, Mosby Heritage Foundation

    "I would have posted this on the preservation folder, but nobody reads that!" - Christopher Daley

    The AC was not started with the beginner in mind. - Jim Kindred

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia
    Posts
    119

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    According to a piece in Larry J. Daniels book, Soldiering in the Army of Tennesse: A portrait of Life in a Confederate Army, he brings up the issue of the bayonet while the Confederates camped near Tullahoma in the summer of 1863. Daniels tells us that "While at Tullahoma, the infantry reported a dearth of bayonets; only half of the troops were supplied with them"(48).
    Lieutenant Colonel Arthur Fremantle addresses the problem in his diary. In The Fremantle Diary: A Journal of the Confederacy, edited by Walter Lord, Fremantle, reviewing St. John Liddell's brigade at Bellbuckle, recalls, "Many however, had lost or thrown away their bayonets, which they don't appear to value properly, as they assert that they have never met any Yankees who would wait for that weapon" (124-125).
    Obviously, this is a review of only one brigade of the army but it could give us some insight to this being something fairly popular throughout the army. While presenting public history for CCNMP, I usually did not carry a bayonet unless I was portraying an ANV soldier or a AOTC soldier. I often quoted the above account to the general public that I encountered. I did this to let the public know that not every soldier had every piece of equipment that was "on the market" at the time. When I do get some time, I will look into what I can possibly find on the ANV soldier and the bayonet situation.

    Christopher Young

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Lexington, NC
    Posts
    192

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    "Would an impression of an ANV soldier without a bayonet be farby?"- Yours, Eric Sepalla

    Eric,

    While an event with unit generic impressions like say a "Gettysburg Hootenany" will almost always let anything go, however a unit/company specific well documented impression could very well be farby without a bayonet. It depends on who, what, when, where, and how.

    If you are going as an "ANV soldier at the Gettysburg 141st annual Hooter and Howler Event" then what does it matter? Just do your best under the circumstances. But if you are doing Company A, 53d NCT under Col. W.A. Owens, Daniel's Brigade, Rodes' Division at the Gettysburg NPS event, then a well researched soldier specific impression is needed. You will find that events with more stringet guidelines and more specific details of units/soldiers portrayed, will be much more rewarding than a less than specific or more generic impression wil afford.

    So your question is as ambiguous as the answer could be. It just depends on how good a quality of impression you are wanting to make of it.

    I hope this helps,

    Mark Berrier
    North State Rifles
    combinations@northstate.net

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Rome, Georgia
    Posts
    135

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    I'm going to elaborate on one of Dusty's point -- stacking -- but give a modern reason. Safety is a primary concern for us and the alternative to stacking arms is grounding arms. Grounding arms has the potential for "scooping up" gravel or debris from the ground.

    I was once commanded a company where this actually happened. My habit had always been to bring a company to "reverse arms" after ground arms and tell the men to give the musket a shake. This one time a small piece of pea gravel came rolling out. Since then it has been S.O.P. for me that "if you can't stack em', you gotta hold em'."

    I'm a great fan of the Chick/Chatt authenticity regs but you have to remember that these are for Living History Programs. The regs also call for only a small percentage of the men to carry canteens but how many officers are going to allow their men to go into a modern event without a handy supply of water?
    Marlin Teat
    “The initial or easy tendency in looking at history is to see it through hindsight. In doing that, we remove the fact that living historical actors at that time…didn’t yet know what was going to happen. We cannot understand the decisions they made unless we understand how they perceived the world they were living in and the choices they were facing.”-Christopher Browning

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Kennett Sq PA
    Posts
    110

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    Marlin

    Hardee's 1855 manual gives us another option for stacking. It doesn't involve the use of the bayonet, so for groups that are light on bayonets. Could it be possible that they may have reverted back to this drill?

    Stack-ARMS.
    410. At this command the front rank man of every even numbered file will pass his piece before him, seizing it with the left hand near the upper band; will place the butt a little in advance of his left too, the barrel turned towards the body, and draw the rammer slightly from its place; the front rank man of every, odd numbered file will also draw the rammer slightly, and ass his piece to the man next on his left, who will seize it with the right hand near the upper band, and place the butt a little in advance of the right too of the man next on his right, the barrel turned to the front; he will then cross the rammers 'of the two pieces, the rammer of the piece of the odd numbered man being inside; the rear rank man of every even file will also draw his rammer, lean his piece forward, the lock plate downwards, advance the right foot about six inches, and insert the rammer between the rammer and barrel of the piece of his front rank man; with his left hand he will place the butt of his piece on the ground, thirty-two inches in rear of, and perpendicular to, the front rank, bringing back his, right foot by the side of the left; the front rank man of every even file will at the same time lean the stack to the rear, quit it with his is right hand, and force all the ram rammers down. The stack being thus formed, the rear rank man of every odd file will pass his into his left hand, the barrel to the front, and inclining it forward, will rest it on the stack.

    411. The men of both ranks having taken the position of the soldier without arms, the instructor will command:

    This allows you to stack and keep debris from going down the barrels when you ground. It doesn't take much longer to perform than Hardees 62 with bayonets.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Rome, Georgia
    Posts
    135

    Re: Confederate soldiers without bayonets

    I think there is a high possibility that at least some stacked using rammers. But even if they did ground arms, they probably weren't all that worried about a little debris down the barrel during an engagement. My worry is a modern worry. I've always been considered a mother hen in regard to safety, but then I've been shot with staples, had wonder-wads whistle over my head, and been blasted in the face by 14 year old dismounted cavalry in bad hats.

    (I know the best way to avoid these incidents is to stay away from maintream events but these happened in my younger and more reckless days.)
    Marlin Teat
    “The initial or easy tendency in looking at history is to see it through hindsight. In doing that, we remove the fact that living historical actors at that time…didn’t yet know what was going to happen. We cannot understand the decisions they made unless we understand how they perceived the world they were living in and the choices they were facing.”-Christopher Browning

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Confederate issue canteens
    By pvtben in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-04-2004, 04:10 PM
  2. 1863-65 - Confederate Imports and Blockade Bibliography
    By Barclay in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-29-2004, 05:25 PM
  3. Trip to "The Confederate Nation"
    By Emmanuel Dabney in forum Civilian Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-29-2004, 03:07 AM
  4. Trans-Mississippi Depot Co. Items For Sale!
    By Eureka Independent in forum Buy, Sell & Trade
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-05-2004, 01:44 PM
  5. Event Guidelines: Confederate Clothing Issue
    By tarwater_mess in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-28-2003, 11:18 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts