CS Saddles show.on.Folder
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Medina State of Northern Ohio
    Posts
    6,169

    Post Basic Research 102

    Hallo Kameraden!

    Having once been a professional psycho-social researcher, I would borrow some possible definitions of research terminology...

    Primary: Sources that contain raw, original, non interpreted and unevaluated information. These are best when the information comes from an "eye witness" or "participant." While the written word is considered better than oral tradition, there is also the value of period images as well as artifacts. (Historians love these.) Primary sources tend to come first in the publication cycle. Often in newspapers, weekly and monthly-produced magazines; letters, diaries, correspondence, diplomatic records.
    Primary sources are also surviving artifacts (but they require their own additional research in the form of analysis and evaluation to put them into a correct period context of material culture, technology, application, and circumstance. An antique or relic, taken out of its period context, standing alone, is called a “statistical artifact,” and may or may not be valid or supportive of the research idea, theory, or hypothesis.)

    Secondary: Sources that digest, analyze, evaluate and interpret the information contained within primary sources. They tend to be argumentative. Secondary sources tend to come second in the publication cycle. Often scholarly periodicals and books. (Professors like these.) Articles in scholarly journals analyzing the war, possibly footnoting primary documents; books analyzing the war.

    Tertiary: Sources that compile, analyze, and digest secondary sources. They tend to be factual, however how reliable and valid they are can vary based upon the methodology of the research or the analysis, and interpretations drawn. Tertiary sources tend to come last in the publication cycle. Often reference books.

    "Sources" will vary according to the type of research. However, the Library of Congress breaks sources down as follows:

    Primary:

    biography (only if it's on an autobiographical record)
    cases
    correspondence
    description and travel
    diaries
    fiction
    interview
    personal narrative
    pictorial works
    poetry
    short stories
    sources

    Secondary:

    biography (only if it's describing a biography--not an autobiography)
    criticism and interpretation
    history
    history and criticism
    government policy
    law and legislation
    moral and ethical aspects
    political aspects
    politics and government
    psychological aspects
    public opinion
    religion
    religious aspects
    social policy
    study and teaching

    Tertiary:

    abstracts
    bibliography
    bio-bibliography
    chronology
    classification
    dictionaries
    dictionaries and encyclopedias
    directories
    encyclopedias
    guidebooks
    handbooks, manuals, etc.
    identification
    indexes
    registers
    statistics
    tables
    index

    The combination of well-done primary, secondary, and tertiary sources combines to form the "hinge pin" of where our collective Civil War knowledge rests at any given moment. New questions leads to new research often opens new knowledge and pushes the model forward. However, the model has to work from the starting point of primary sources and resources.


    All too often, we want to start at tertiary sources. Worse yet, we tend to be "consumers of research of various quality" rather than "producers of research of various quality." Meaning, we all too often want to simply use tertiary sources as evidence simply because the author got his correct or incorrect analysis and opinions in print (publishers print to sell books and return initial investments, not to establish truth or veracity).

    Worse, is the ability of bogus and incorrect information to be posted on web sites and have it pass as researched fact. At least on the forums, that which is outside of the "hinge point" can be challenged, supported, defended, proven or disproven where a static website is immune to question.
    In gleichem Schritt und Tritt, Curt Schmidt

    -Hard and sharp as flint...secret, and self-contained, and solitary as an oyster.
    -Haplogroup R1b M343 (Subclade R1b1a2 M269)
    -Pointless Folksy Wisdom Mess, Oblio Lodge #1
    -Vastly Ignorant
    -Often incorrect, technically, historically, factually.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    79 Wistful Vista
    Posts
    5,051

    Re: Basic Research 102

    Curt,

    Absolutely a great post, I do hope this will be put in a place where it will always be accessible on the forum this is essential information for those wanting to get past the mainstream step. Why proper research techniques are not longer taught in high school is nothing but a mystery.

    Thanks
    Jim Kindred

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    267

    Where to begin?

    The problem even for those with some research training is "where do I begin?"

    It's very daunting to think of tackling primary research, so most of us are content to read secondary sources. For example, after reading Coddington's The Gettysburg Campaign, I don't think I could imagine even reading another Gettysburg overview.

    So it's easy to see that the beginner could say "man, why should I bother?"

    What many of us overlook is the abundance of material out there in unexpected places, much of it ignored by researchers. In my own hometown, for example, the historical society has material about Montclair in the Civil War that is not well-documented and can be viewed relatively easily. The Schoolhouse Museum in nearby Ridgewood has a number of important clothing items, including a federal overcoat and a frock coat (thanks to the Hintzens, Mark and Faith, for telling me of this fine resource).

    So even for the person who is intimidated at the thought of DOING research, there are opportunities to explore the period more deeply, including resources that are rarely, if ever, made available for perusal or put on display. As has been pointed out, simply cataloging them might be of help to the local historians, and volunteers are often needed for transcribing or recording things in poor condition or that would be useful if rendered in a form that most humans can read. I know of several friends who have mastered 19th Century penmanship in order to help transcribe primary documents.
    Bill Cross
    The Rowdy Pards

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Basic information
    By boreguard in forum 2004 - 2016 Events
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-08-2011, 04:30 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-24-2007, 05:25 PM
  3. Basic Research 104
    By Curt Schmidt in forum Research Projects
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2004, 05:47 PM
  4. Basic Research 103
    By Curt Schmidt in forum Research Projects
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2004, 05:38 PM
  5. Basic Research 101 Prerequisite
    By Curt Schmidt in forum Research Projects
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-14-2004, 04:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Parker-Hale Raffle