RichmondDepot show.on.folder
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    557

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    I think Jim's right about the impossibility of getting good numbers; moreover we may need to think of several categories of clothing: clothing sent from home; clothing procured locally with commutation funds provided by the government (prior to December, 1862); clothing provided by the state; and clothing issued by the Confederate quartermaster department.

    Since this runs the risk of simply compounding the impossibility of getting an answer, maybe we should restate the problem as 1) finished clothing items provided by the quartermaster department, and 2) all other sources.

    If you can find the clothing issued by the depots through the sources given earlier (or come up with a reasonable estimate), then you can subtract that number from what the troops theoretically required. The resulting number would roughly indicate what they got from other sources.

    To calculate the theoretical requirements, you multiply the official issue by the number of troops in service.

    The official issue rate comes from G. O. 100 of December 8, 1862 (announcing the end of the commutation system -- the three numbers indicate issues for the first, second, and third year of service):

    Cap, complete ………………….. 2-1-1 $2
    Cover …………………………… 1-1-1 $0.38
    Jacket …………………………… 2-1-1 $12
    Trowsers …………………………3-2-2 $9
    Shirt ………………………………3-3-3 $3
    Drawers …………………………..3-3-3 $3
    Shoes, pairs ……………………… 4-4-4 $6
    Socks, pairs ……………………… 4-4-4 $1.60
    Leather stock ……………………... 1-0-0 $0.25
    Great-coat ………………………… 1-0-0 $25
    Stable-frock for mounted men ……. 1-0-0 $2
    Fatigue overall (for engineers & ordnance) 1-1-1 $3
    Blanket……………………………. 1-0-1 $7.50

    The estimated number of men in service comes from Livermore's "Numbers and Losses" (p. 47), broken down by year:

    1861: 231,729
    1862: 376,406
    1863: 424,018
    1864: 463,891
    1865: 463,181

    1861 and 1865 should be prorated.

    This calculation would assume that the issue rate reflected actual use rate. This might not be too far off if we further assume that, although troops went through clothing more quickly in active service than projected, they simply became more ragged than desired but not actually naked.

    You can probably also ignore some items that were provided in small numbers, if at all, like leather stocks and stable frocks. Apart from this, the calculation would ignore a host of local variables. But I think that, with a decent spreadsheet, it would give a general idea of the overall ratio of what the CS QMD provided, vs. what had to be obtained through other means.

    Good luck -- if you actually undertake such a calculation and can share it, the rest of us would be much obliged.
    Michael A. Schaffner

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    87

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    Quote Originally Posted by Pvt Schnapps View Post
    I think Jim's right about the impossibility of getting good numbers; moreover we may need to think of several categories of clothing: clothing sent from home; clothing procured locally with commutation funds provided by the government (prior to December, 1862); clothing provided by the state; and clothing issued by the Confederate quartermaster department.

    Since this runs the risk of simply compounding the impossibility of getting an answer, maybe we should restate the problem as 1) finished clothing items provided by the quartermaster department, and 2) all other sources.

    If you can find the clothing issued by the depots through the sources given earlier (or come up with a reasonable estimate), then you can subtract that number from what the troops theoretically required. The resulting number would roughly indicate what they got from other sources.

    To calculate the theoretical requirements, you multiply the official issue by the number of troops in service.

    The official issue rate comes from G. O. 100 of December 8, 1862 (announcing the end of the commutation system -- the three numbers indicate issues for the first, second, and third year of service):

    Cap, complete ………………….. 2-1-1 $2
    Cover …………………………… 1-1-1 $0.38
    Jacket …………………………… 2-1-1 $12
    Trowsers …………………………3-2-2 $9
    Shirt ………………………………3-3-3 $3
    Drawers …………………………..3-3-3 $3
    Shoes, pairs ……………………… 4-4-4 $6
    Socks, pairs ……………………… 4-4-4 $1.60
    Leather stock ……………………... 1-0-0 $0.25
    Great-coat ………………………… 1-0-0 $25
    Stable-frock for mounted men ……. 1-0-0 $2
    Fatigue overall (for engineers & ordnance) 1-1-1 $3
    Blanket……………………………. 1-0-1 $7.50

    The estimated number of men in service comes from Livermore's "Numbers and Losses" (p. 47), broken down by year:

    1861: 231,729
    1862: 376,406
    1863: 424,018
    1864: 463,891
    1865: 463,181

    .
    As a partial examination, the book Confederate Industry claims CS Army QM data shows the issue during 1864 of:

    744, 851 pairs of shoes (all but 199,851 pairs imported)
    316,000 imported blankets (the south being without machinery to make suitable ones)
    458, 131 jackets were issued.
    744, 851 pairs of trousers issued.
    (of the above, it is estimated ca. 200,000 suits, or ca. 1/3 were made of imported cloth).
    [pgs. 178-179]

    With nearly 463, 891 men in service during 1864, the above suggests that theoretically the CS Army produced a uniform for all but ca. 10,000 men during the year. We can add into this the bureaucracy factor, and the known wastefullness of the troops in the field, as well as the evidence that the majority of this material was issued principally to the ANV and AOT (which two armies contained at best less than half the total of men) and not necessarily divided evenly between the various departments, and that all the while the new issues were made, huge quantities of the garments in use were reaching the end of their service life... etc.; and the theoretical quantity is boiled down to time and place, and the efficiency of the unit, and availability of the supply, etc.. Regardless, the above quantity was barely sufficient according to the numbers was at worst largely insufficient, or at least barely insufficient. There was clearly no large scale surplus...

    archie.
    James "Archie" Marshall
    The Buzzard Club (Saltmakers for the south)
    Tampa, FL

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    557

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    Thank you, Archie! Just one question: you have the same number for both trowsers and shoes. Is that right?

    For the other items, I'm going to go out on a limb and do a preliminary calculation. If we look at the average annual rate of issue in G.O. 100 and multiply it by Livermore's average number of Confederate soldiers in the ranks for 1864, we come up with the theoretical requirement, which we can then compare to the production numbers you give above.

    All sorts of caveats apply, including those you mentioned, especially soldiers' complaints that clothing wore out much more quickly on active service than the Regs allowed.

    Given that, 463,891 soldiers would have required (x1.333) 618,367 jackets, of which the actual procurement (458,131) met 74% of the need.

    The same number of soldiers would have required (x.666) 308,951 blankets, for which actual procurement (316,000) provided a small, 2% surplus.

    Depending on whether the 744,851 number applies to trowsers or shoes, it represents 69% of the theoretical requirement for the former, but only 40% for the latter.

    I'd be very interested in seeing which article that number applies to.

    1864 seems a good year to look at, as the depot system was probably functioning at its peak then.
    Michael A. Schaffner

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    495

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    Archie,

    Does the book specify if those numbers include clothing from state QM departments? If it doesn't then we need to take those numbers with a big pinch of salt. North Carolina, Georgia, and to a lesser extent South Carolina were still making and issuing significant numbers of uniforms for their soldiers. All three states were at best lukewarm to the CSQMD because of previous shortages of clothing to their men and so they they worked in a kind of parallel system to supply clothing to the men of their states. North Carolina was even able to send a large shipment of surplus clothing to the Army of Tennessee in early 1864.....

    This doesn't even touch what was produced at home or captured from the field. The University of Mississippi owns a home made jacket that was owned by a member of the 3rd Mississippi Cavalry who was killed near Atlanta. I've seen records where units detailed men to go home and make or procure clothing and shoes for their company/regiment or had them made in camp. In the Trans-MS, it was not uncommon for some units to be issued cloth and have the men make their own clothing. I know this was the case with a couple of Louisiana cavalry units in early 1863.

    Will MacDonald

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    87

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    Quote Originally Posted by Mississippian View Post
    Archie,

    Does the book specify if those numbers include clothing from state QM departments? If it doesn't then we need to take those numbers with a big pinch of salt. North Carolina, Georgia, and to a lesser extent South Carolina were still making and issuing significant numbers of uniforms for their soldiers. All three states were at best lukewarm to the CSQMD because of previous shortages of clothing to their men and so they they worked in a kind of parallel system to supply clothing to the men of their states. North Carolina was even able to send a large shipment of surplus clothing to the Army of Tennessee in early 1864.....

    This doesn't even touch what was produced at home or captured from the field. The University of Mississippi owns a home made jacket that was owned by a member of the 3rd Mississippi Cavalry who was killed near Atlanta. I've seen records where units detailed men to go home and make or procure clothing and shoes for their company/regiment or had them made in camp. In the Trans-MS, it was not uncommon for some units to be issued cloth and have the men make their own clothing. I know this was the case with a couple of Louisiana cavalry units in early 1863.

    Will MacDonald
    Howdy will,

    I do not have my copy of Confederate Industry at hand (its been perennially loaned out of late), but I do see on Google books, that (p. 128-129), the CS Army QMD was calculating the clothing issued by GA and NC into its totals. Here is the breakdown according to A.R. Lawton's REcords, (this should answer part of Michael's question posted earlier...):
    Jan-JUne, 1864:
    397, 594 prs. shoes (including 37, 657 from GA, and 9, 263 from NC.)
    242, 337 jackets (including 26, 747 from GA, and 21, 301 from NC.)
    353, 433 prs. pants (including 28, 808 from GA. and 32, 104 from NC.)
    JUly-Dec. 64 issues totalled: (including GA and NC issues not broken down in the book, as with the previous...)
    shoes, pr. 347, 257,
    jackets, 215, 703,
    pants, 342, 399

    Regarding home made, I have no doubt a considerable portion of CS troops remained in "homespun" throughout the war. My comments above regard the "theoretical" quantity of CS Army issue clothing compared tot he number of troops. The totals above serve only to demonstrate the CS ARmy's contribution to the spectrum of Confederate army clothing. I also suspect that large numbers of men may have drawn army clothes, but did not wear them. Robert Watson of the 7th Fla. mentions selling his clothes for food, etc. Also, there are some references in Bell Wiley's JOhnny Reb, regarding sending army clothes home to destitute families, etc. etc. Freemantle himself quotes officers of the AOT in 1863 that the men could be provided uniforms, but within a week would be dressed as they pleased...

    cheers,

    Archie
    James "Archie" Marshall
    The Buzzard Club (Saltmakers for the south)
    Tampa, FL

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Little Rock, AR
    Posts
    325

    Re: Confederate issued to home procured uniforms - Ratio

    It was either William Watson or William Tunnard, both of the 3rd Louisiana Inf. and both wrote memoirs after the war, said that the regiment only drew clothing from the Gov't twice in their 4 year service. The regiment received clothing in Oct. of '61, and then again in the winter/spring of '64/'65. The 3rd spent their entire service in the Trans-Miss., with a short time at Vicksburg.

    When looking at the numbers of clothing, shoes, etc., that were produced by the Confederate QM's around the South, it's important to keep in mind that just because uniforms were being made didn't mean that these uniform were making onto the backs of the soldiers in the field. We like to look at the number of uniforms being produced and say "ah ha, the Confederate soldier was well clothed, just look at the numbers of clothing being made", etc. In Shreveport during the summer and fall of 1864, a Union spy made his way from New Orleans to Shreveport, over to east Texas and back to NOLA. He reported that there were warehouses full of clothes and blankets in Shreveport, but if you read primary accounts of the soldiers serving in that department they tell a different story. Then, while reading the OR's one day, I cam across a report from a Confederate Commissary officer, and he was making mention of all the food stuffs that were going rotten because there was no rolling stock to get the food out into the field to the men who needed it. How much more important is it to feed your army than to give them a new jacket? As the war progressed, the South was looking it's railroads (i.e. engines, cars and tracks) and wagons were becoming more and more scare, too. Yes, a clothing depot reports that they made 200,000 jackets, but have you researched beyond that to find out how these jackets were getting from the depot to the soldiers in the field? Or, do you just assume that because a depot made 200,000 jacket that it means 200,000 Confederate soldiers received a new jacket?
    Nic Clark
    2013 - 20 years in the hobby
    Proud co-founder of the Butcherknife Roughnecks

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. questions on confederate uniforms.
    By mattbass888 in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-04-2010, 06:42 PM
  2. Confederate issue uniforms of the 42nd Mississippi
    By longstreet7 in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-13-2010, 12:39 PM
  3. Early War English Confederate Uniforms
    By Ken Myers in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-03-2010, 11:01 PM
  4. Confederate Uniforms for Sale
    By Fred Adolphus in forum Wanting to Sell
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-17-2009, 09:34 PM
  5. confederate issued cone wrenches
    By fedhead in forum Authenticity Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-02-2008, 07:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts