Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

    Link to the AP story


    Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site
    By DAVID DISHNEAU
    Associated Press Writer
    SHARPSBURG, Md. -- Cutting through a cornfield where soldiers were literally blown to bits on the bloodiest day of the Civil War, a hiker spied something near a groundhog hole: fragments of bone and a metal button, clotted with red clay.

    He brought the remains to the visitors center at Antietam National Battlefield, where they were turned over to experts who made a stunning discovery: They belonged to a Union soldier from New York state.

    The remarkable find 146 years after the soldier perished is a reminder that the battlefield at Antietam is "ground that was basically changed forever by what happened on it," Superintendent John W. Howard said Thursday.

    Many of the nearly 3,700 soldiers killed in the pivotal 1862 battle were buried in nearby cemeteries five years later, but the New York soldier's remains were somehow overlooked until now.

    The handful of bone fragments, iron uniform buttons and U.S. belt buckle help bring into focus the story that battlefield rangers strive to tell.

    "These armies were made up of people, of men who fought here," Howard said.

    The soldier's identity may remain a mystery. Howard said he was young, probably between 19 and 21, based on the condition of teeth in a recovered jawbone. A National Park Service archaeologist and Smithsonian Institution anthropologist were the ones who confirmed he was a soldier.

    And he apparently was no fresh recruit. Five iron buttons found along with textile fragments included some from a coat issued in New York and others bearing the "Excelsior" slogan of federal uniforms, an indication that he had served long enough to replace the lost originals.

    The soldier could have served in any of 24 New York regiments that fought in the field where fierce small-arms and artillery fire obliterated cornstalks and men alike.

    "We've always worked with the number that there's somewhere between 140 and 200 missing in action here, and some of them, because of the volume of fire, they just ceased to exist as an entity - they were just totally destroyed," Howard said.

    About 23,100 soldiers were killed, wounded, captured or declared missing at Antietam on Sept. 17, 1862. Days later, the dead were buried less than three feet deep in the rocky soil, marked by crude wooden headboards.

    Five years later, most were dug up and reburied - the Union soldiers at the Antietam National Cemetery and the Confederates in nearby towns.

    Howard said the New York soldier's remains were found beside one of the limestone outcroppings that stud the rolling hills at Antietam like whitecaps. He said farmers who worked the soil after the war avoided such outcroppings to spare their machinery, which explains how the soldier stayed hidden for so long.

    Remains turn up from time to time. A visitor found the last set, belonging to four unidentified members of the Irish Brigade, in 1989, Howard said.

    He said the New York soldier's bones may be buried in the Antietam National Cemetery next spring, after the park service and Douglas Owsley, a forensic pathologist at the Smithsonian's natural history museum, complete their examination. The park service will first contact the adjutant general of New York state to ask whether the state wants the remains, he said.

    Owsley declined comment on the case because he hasn't yet examined the bones closely.

    Historians consider Antietam, also known as the battle of Sharpsburg, a turning point in the war because Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee's retreat from the battlefield gave President Abraham Lincoln the political strength to issue the Emancipation Proclamation five days later.


    -- Regards,
    Bill O'Dea
    Salt Boiler mess / 122nd NY

  • #2
    Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

    Wow....All these years later and they're still digging up "parts".
    Travis Franklin
    "Patrick Fhailen"

    The Missoura Shirkers
    4th Mo. Inf.

    "The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

      "And he apparently was no fresh recruit. Five iron buttons found along with textile fragments included some from a coat issued in New York and others bearing the "Excelsior" slogan of federal uniforms, an indication that he had served long enough to replace the lost originals."

      They went way out on a limb saying this. He could have lost buttons the first day he wore the coat!
      [B]Mike Wilkins[/B]

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

        Heres a news video link:

        Gregory Randazzo

        Gawdawful Mess http://www.gawdawfulmess.com
        John Brizzay Mess
        SkillyGalee Mess
        http://skillygalee-mess.blogspot.com/

        "The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862

        “These people delight to destroy the weak and those who can make no defense; it suits them.” R.E. Lee referring to the Federal Army.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

          Right interesting stuff this...BUT, t'would have been better had the person who made the discovery left the stuff "in situ" . Following NPS policy means that the objects should have been left "as is". A law enforcement officer should've been contacted. And then that individual would've brought in folks from resource management. This goes for ANY artifact found on NPS property. Don't get me wrong, I find this discovery amazing and very cool. However, I wonder was was "lost" in moving the objects from their original locale. Just my 2 cents...
          John Marler
          Franklin, TN

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

            Originally posted by Slouch View Post
            "And he apparently was no fresh recruit. Five iron buttons found along with textile fragments included some from a coat issued in New York and others bearing the "Excelsior" slogan of federal uniforms, an indication that he had served long enough to replace the lost originals."

            They went way out on a limb saying this. He could have lost buttons the first day he wore the coat!
            The iron buttons were most likely tr0user buttons and whoever was doing the evaluation didn't know the difference between them and coat buttons. Not surprising.
            Jim Mayo
            Portsmouth Rifles, Company G, 9th Va. Inf.

            CW Show and Tell Site
            http://www.angelfire.com/ma4/j_mayo/index.html

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

              Originally posted by Jimmayo View Post
              ...whoever was doing the evaluation didn't know... Not surprising.
              I could not agree more.

              I have scratched my head over many of these quick 'field' assessments. There was a time not so long ago when archaeologists shied away from the media, especially when human remains were involved. I. N. C. Hume has written and spoken aplenty about the tenuous relationship between the profession and the press.
              B. G. Beall (Long Gone)

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

                Did anyone else hear that our man of the hour had an impacted wisdom tooth?
                [FONT="Book Antiqua"]Respectfully,
                Joseph S. Danner

                [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
                [COLOR="Red"]The Pine River Boys - 7th Wisconsin, Company I[/COLOR][/FONT]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

                  Originally posted by Vuhginyuh View Post
                  I could not agree more.

                  I have scratched my head over many of these quick 'field' assessments. There was a time not so long ago when archaeologists shied away from the media, especially when human remains were involved.

                  Hence the reason the word just got out and the remains were found last October, and all "field assessments" were done the first week of December. We're (the battlefield) still waiting on the final report of the findings. I will also say that having talked to one of the archaeologists that was on site, he knows damn well what's what as far as what material objects were found (as well as human remains). We also have to remember that the job these guys did is only half of the whole picture. These items are taken back to a facility for further analysis to determine exactly what the buttons, bits of cloth, leather etc., etc. were once a part of. A person also has to remember that these archaeologists aren't just dealing with mid-19th Century America all the time......
                  Last edited by ohiofed; 01-14-2009, 11:28 PM. Reason: clarification
                  Isaac Forman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

                    Hi..

                    I too wonder why they didn't call the NPS rather than move the artifacts. Personally, I would fear damaging the item especially if I moved it. As for the overall discovery, wow. I would have thought the artifacts would have been buried so far deep or five finger removed.

                    Overall, great story.

                    Jill
                    Jill A. Pierson
                    [email]Chesnutmor@aol.com[/email] and [email]jillpierson@yahoo.com[/email]
                    "....It is history that teaches us to hope."
                    Robert E. Lee

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Union soldier's bones found at Md. Civil War site

                      Originally posted by chesnutmor View Post
                      Hi..

                      I too wonder why they didn't call the NPS rather than move the artifacts. Personally, I would fear damaging the item especially if I moved it. As for the overall discovery, wow. I would have thought the artifacts would have been buried so far deep or five finger removed.

                      Overall, great story.

                      Jill
                      From the Frederick News-Post Online.

                      [Superintendent John W.] "Howard said the New York soldier's remains were found beside one of the limestone outcroppings that stud the rolling hills at Antietam like whitecaps. He said farmers who worked the soil after the war avoided such outcroppings to spare their machinery, which explains how the soldier stayed hidden for so long."

                      Not all the stories carried the above paragraph. Once you see this, its easily understandable why this young soldier stayed hidden for 146 years.
                      [COLOR="Black"][/COLOR][FONT="Georgia"][SIZE="4"][COLOR="Red"][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT]

                      2nd Lt. James Ward
                      Adjutant
                      1st Maryland Artillery (Dement's Battery)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X