Re: Stupid Question
	
		
			
			
				
	
Mike is correct. Very few of the wood packing boxes for small arms ammunition survived. On the other hand, because they were so common during the War, many of them show up in photos. Of course, the problem with photos, is they usually only show one face of the packing box and even with high resolution, you often can't make out the stencils. There is a problem with even those few surviving boxes, almost none of them still have their tops, Some arsenals stenciled their name on the side of the box, while others didn't. Without a top, there's no way to know which arsenal produced those unmarked boxes. One exception is a Watervliet box at the National Museum in Gettysburg. This box had leather hinges added and was used for storage. 
At some point, during the War, the Richmond Arsenal started packing their ammunition in a different box. It was more narrow and taller than the QM specs called for. My guess, the change was made to make better use of the available lumber.
I'm waiting to hear from the Watervliet Arsenal about the U.S.B. stencil.
					
					Originally posted by Pvt Schnapps
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		At some point, during the War, the Richmond Arsenal started packing their ammunition in a different box. It was more narrow and taller than the QM specs called for. My guess, the change was made to make better use of the available lumber.
I'm waiting to hear from the Watervliet Arsenal about the U.S.B. stencil.



Comment